Tom Rauschenbach wrote:
>
> Did anybody actually get this thing ? I got 14 warnings about it, the NPR news
> is full of it. I don't have it and I want to see it!
As it happens, yes. I received three copies of it. I don't run Outlook, of course.
BUT...
At work (my client's site, which i
does
explicitly mention clicking on the attachment.
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Marc Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2000 7:22 AM
To: Jerry Eckert
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Today's reason not to run Windows
See http://www.zdnet.com/tlkbck/
See http://www.zdnet.com/tlkbck/comment/22/0,7056,88759-421762,00.html to
support my assertions.
- Marc
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Jerry Eckert wrote:
> Marc Evans wrote:
> >
> >I beg to differ, but this is hadly the forum. The VB file attached is
> >immediately executed upon retrieval from the POP b
Today, Thomas Charron gleaned this insight:
> Here I am, looking in preview mode, without a thing.. Funny that.. :-P
Are you sure? Check Kenny Lussier's message about how to detect it. See
if it compromised your system or not...
--
PGP/GPG Public key at http://cerberus.ne.mediaone.net
Ferenc Tamas Gyurcsan wrote:
>
> >Did anybody actually get this thing ? I got 14 warnings about it, the NPR news
> >is full of it. I don't have it and I want to see it! Please continue this
> Yepp, we got it. It made a pretty good mess at work. It was funny.
> Ferenc
I feel unloved - did nob
>Did anybody actually get this thing ? I got 14 warnings about it, the NPR news
>is full of it. I don't have it and I want to see it! Please continue this
Yepp, we got it. It made a pretty good mess at work. It was funny.
Ferenc
**
To u
Here I am, looking in preview mode, without a thing.. Funny that.. :-P
- Original Message -
From: Kurth Bemis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tom Rauschenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: Today's reason
At 07:17 PM 5/4/2000 -0400, Tom Rauschenbach wrote:
i have a copy of the source. I am posting it to the list! :-) be very
careful with it.
~kurth
>Folks,
>
>I changed the subject line for a reason. I use (and bash whenever possible)
>Outlook at work and Linux and kmail at home. Both of
Marc Evans wrote:
>
>I beg to differ, but this is hadly the forum. The VB file attached is
>immediately executed upon retrieval from the POP box. The user does not
>have to open the message in any fashion, if the preview feature is
>enabled.
Why is it that none of the information releases from th
Folks,
I changed the subject line for a reason. I use (and bash whenever possible)
Outlook at work and Linux and kmail at home. Both of which are not germane to
this thread.
Did anybody actually get this thing ? I got 14 warnings about it, the NPR news
is full of it. I don't have it and I
I beg to differ, but this is hadly the forum. The VB file attached is
immediately executed upon retrieval from the POP box. The user does not
have to open the message in any fashion, if the preview feature is
enabled.
To make some reasonable use of this bandwidth at least, below you will
find som
Marc Evans wrote:
>
>I wish this were true, but it sadly is not. The MS Outlook program has a
>"feature" which previews messages. Anyone who has that feature turned on,
>which I believe it is by default, would become infected simply by
>retrieving messages from theie pop/imap/whatever box.
The Ou
> On Thu, 4 May 2000, Thomas Charron wrote:
> > You know, all of this bashing on why Outlook does this and that, not
one
> > has mentioned that *IT'S the DUMMIES WHO RAN IT*'s fault. It didn't run
> > itself. Someone had to open it.. This is a question of intelligence,
which
> > has *NOTHING*
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Thomas Charron wrote:
> You know, all of this bashing on why Outlook does this and that, not one
> has mentioned that *IT'S the DUMMIES WHO RAN IT*'s fault. It didn't run
> itself. Someone had to open it.. This is a question of intelligence, which
> has *NOTHING* do wit
secured NT box..
Ok, stop laughing..
A properly secured NT box would have been just as safe as a Linux user
opening a like *EXECUTABLE*.
- Original Message -
From: Tom Rauschenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 5:31 PM
Subject
I never got the damn virus. Could somebody send me a copy ?
TIA
TomR
--
Standard is better than better. If your web page cares what browser I'm using
it's broken.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
**
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAI
16 matches
Mail list logo
