On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, at 3:29pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> However, by ssh'ing to systemB, and from there to systemC, I run 'tcpdump
> -i eth1 icmp' and I can see that systemC *is* in fact receiving the "icmp
> echo request" packets. systemC just isn't replying to them!
That is significant.
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, at 9:27am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I completely concur with this sentiment but I would point out that we live
> in an era when appearances are more important than substance to many
> people (present company excepted).
True. Next question: Do I want to work for one of the
In a message dated: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:16:12 EST
Dan Coutu said:
>So we need to examine the possibility that System C doesn't know how to
>reach System A even though A does know how to reach C. I'd check netmasks
>on all the systems involved. If I am remembering right you're going from a
>Cla
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:10:41 EST
"Ken D'Ambrosio" said:
I shouldn't be an ARP issue -- if it were, then the other machine sending
pings wouldn't work. Namely:
Keep in mind. The pinging machine, systemA *cannot* ping systemC,
but *can* ping system
In a message dated: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:10:41 EST
"Ken D'Ambrosio" said:
>I shouldn't be an ARP issue -- if it were, then the other machine sending
>pings wouldn't work. Namely:
Keep in mind. The pinging machine, systemA *cannot* ping systemC,
but *can* ping systemB. B and C are on the same
I shouldn't be an ARP issue -- if it were, then the other machine sending
pings wouldn't work. Namely:
- If it were an ARP issue on the primary pinging machine, then that would
infer the something kaput with the default router's MAC -- since that's
the only MAC that would matter in this scena
In a message dated: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:22:24 EST
Marc Evans said:
>When I have seen these in the past, I have usually found them to be caused
>by an ARP issue. Try flushing the arp cache on the systems involved and
>then retry you experiment.
The arp tables are usually empty when this occurs.
In a message dated: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 10:02:11 EST
Kevin D. Clark said:
systemA 192.168.10.10
systemB 10.241.38.11
systemC 10.241.38.16
>Can you ping "A" from "C"?
I can ping from/to
systemA <-> systemB
systemB <-> systemC
but NOT systemA<->systemC.
Whe
When I have seen these in the past, I have usually found them to be caused
by an ARP issue. Try flushing the arp cache on the systems involved and
then retry you experiment. If that doesn't work, look at all routers on
the network to insure that proxy-arp is disabled.
- Marc
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 [
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 9:36 AM
> To: Price, Erik
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Greater New Hampshire LUG
> Subject: Re: PDF vs. .doc [was Re: Boston Linux Conference
> December 3-4
> ]
>
> Is this Mac OS X
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a very bizarre problem going on here. I have a system
A
> on a
> different subnet. From my desktop, I ping the system
B
> and get no
> response.
>
> I ssh to another system
C
> on the same subnet, and can ping that system.
Can you ping
At 09:19 AM 11/25/2002 -0500, Dan Coutu wrote:
I'd use PHP with PDFlib linked to it. Then I could create PDF's or for
that matter the PS source and then have a cron job send all the certs to my
printer.
Wouldn't be that hard, we use PHP and perl now to create hard copy
invoices in RTF. Work
In a message dated: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 09:19:14 EST
"Price, Erik" said:
>I wish I had more time to learn how to use these tools, they sound
>much more versatile than what MacOS X offers. Still, it is very
>easy in MacOS X ... FWIU, the native display format for all documents
>is PDF so you when yo
Hi all,
I have a very bizarre problem going on here. I have a system on a
different subnet. From my desktop, I ping the system and get no
response.
I ssh to another system on the same subnet, and can ping that system.
Additionally, I can ssh to that system from the system on the same
subne
I completely concur with this sentiment but I would point out that we live
in an era when appearances are more important than substance to many people
(present company excepted).
-Alex
P.S. If someone sent their resume in plain text, it would hit the trash can
immediately independent of whether t
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Coutu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 8:57 AM
> To: Greater New Hampshire Linux Users
> Subject: Custom printing from web form data?
>
>
> What I'm trying to accomplish is to print certificates (to be
> snail-mailed)
> base
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 8:32 AM
> To: Erik Price
> Cc: Travis Roy; 'Greater New Hampshire LUG'
> Subject: PDF vs. .doc [was Re: Boston Linux Conference December 3-4 ]
>
>
>
> In a message dated: Sun, 24
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, at 8:57am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My thinking was to use a wee bit o' perl along with Latex and pre-made
graphic elements to crank out a PostScript file for each certificate, then
queue it up to the color printer.
It would likely be cheaper/f
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, at 8:57am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My thinking was to use a wee bit o' perl along with Latex and pre-made
> graphic elements to crank out a PostScript file for each certificate, then
> queue it up to the color printer.
It would likely be cheaper/faster to purchase pre-pri
I have an interesting challenge to meet. I can think of one way to solve it
but was wondering if others knew of already existing tools or techniques
that might make it easier.
What I'm trying to accomplish is to print certificates (to be snail-mailed)
based on data collected from a form on a we
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You can do this easily enough on UNIX with ghostscript package which
> included wrappers for ps2pdf, pdf2ps, etc.. Or, if you
> use TeX for your base formatting language (LaTeX, LyX, etc.) you can
> easily convert from [La]TeX to ps/pdf.
>
> So, with UNIX, you st
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, at 12:29am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> But I thought that most computers shipped with Acrobat. I know it's not a
> default application in Windows distributions, but doesn't it come as one
> of the packaged free programs that computer mftr's ship with their boxes
> to pad their
In a message dated: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 00:29:50 EST
Erik Price said:
>On Friday, November 22, 2002, at 06:09 PM, Travis Roy wrote:
>
>> I don't see PDF being much better since windows users
>> will still have to go get something like Adobe Acrobat. On a Mac
>> however
>> PDF rocks since it's buil
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, at 10:03pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ... I then only sent it out in RTF and everybody would ask for it in DOC,
> I'm assuming the same will
>
> RTF is usually more portable.
How about freaking ASCII text?
:-)
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed
On 22 Nov 2002, at 10:51am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (Look, I had zero problems [that I could tell, but I didn't look
> closely] reading this in OpenOffice, but too me, it's just asinine, to
> send out Linux conference info in .doc format.
Keep in mind that the people who perpetrate this kin
Thanks for your responses.
I am a naive novice when it comes to scanners and images,
...which was my problem. When I turned off the "RGB Defaults" so that they
could be adjusted, the "Autoadjust" feature worked very well.
http://www.totalnetnh.net/~lamb/scan_linux.jpg
http://www.totalnetnh
26 matches
Mail list logo
