Does anyone know offhand how many DNS search domains are allowed to be
issued by a DHCP server to the client?
For some reason I seem to think it's only one, but I don't remember
if that was a protocol limitation or a limit with ISC's
implementation.
Also, anyone know if MS ever fixed their
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know offhand how many DNS search domains are allowed to be
issued by a DHCP server to the client?
For some reason I seem to think it's only one, but I don't remember
if that was a protocol limitation or a limit with ISC's
implementation.
The way
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know offhand how many DNS search domains are allowed to be
issued by a DHCP server to the client?
Technically, one. ISC says, The current DHCP spec doesn't support
specifying a domain
In a message dated: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 13:21:28 EST
Matthew J. Brodeur said:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know offhand how many DNS search domains are allowed to be
issued by a DHCP server to the client?
Technically, one. ISC says, The current DHCP spec doesn't
They're just switching to openfirmware.. Apple and Sun have been using it
for years.
it works, it's easy, it's open, it's customizable.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Greater NH Linux User Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:13 AM
Subject: Intel
In business
http://yahoo.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_09/b3822601_tc102.htm
--
He who hurries can not walk with dignity.
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Ben Boulanger wrote:
In business
http://yahoo.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_09/b3822601_tc102.htm
I hadn't heard about this part:
excerpt
What could derail Linux? The biggest risks are intellectual-property
issues. SCO Group, holder of the original patents for Unix software upon
Paul,
Sorry I could not respond to your CUPS problem as
quickly as I would have liked, but I've been out on
the road swamped with work. Making up for the Holiday
Snow day. Now that I have had a chance to REALLY
read your post I noticed
So, I switched my config from using
In a message dated: 21 Feb 2003 12:31:27 EST
Rob Lembree said:
So you're saying that SCO's finally found a revenue stream?
maddog mentioned this a few weeks ago, but at the time he seemed to
think it unlikely that they would actually attempt to shakedown Linux
distributions. It'll
http://www.80211-planet.com/columns/article.php/1135751
The interesting part:
Most WISP operators look at the back of a piece of equipment, see the FCC
label and say, 'all right, looks good, I'll buy it,' and put it in their
network, Anderson said. What many don't realize is that the system, in
Note that the BLU April 16th meeting will focus on CUPS. I know that
this is quite far into the future for those who want help now, but ...
--
Jerry Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245
While it's true that the proprietary architecture
vendors such as Sun, DEC, et al, had a large system
service capability mentality, I would think that, at
least for the Itanium2-based systems, be they desktop
or server, it would make sense to expand/enhance the
BIOS capabilities ANYWAY, if for no
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Bayard R. Coolidge wrote:
While it's true that the proprietary architecture
vendors such as Sun, DEC, et al, had a large system
service capability mentality, I would think that, at
least for the Itanium2-based systems, be they desktop
or server, it would make sense to
So on my way home I was listening to NHPR. They had some guy from
Verizon talking about that FCC thing the other day about the
deregulation and how they didn't have to sell their lines to other
ISPS.. Well it turns out that it only applies to NEW infrastructure,
not what's there already..
The
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 11:13:09AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t269-s2130826,00.html
I honestly don't think this is huge news. Intel's use of EFI on
Itanium architecture has been going on for some time. EFI has it's good
point and bad;
From the release notes:
The following packages have been deprecated, and may be removed from a
future release of Red Hat Linux:
- pine - License-related issues
Anybody know what the issues are?
--
Jeff Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Into birding? Check out http://www.migratus.com
16 matches
Mail list logo
