Here ya go, I do the exact same thing. I build an ssh tunnel from work
to my home and it is very seemless, once you figure out the routing.
/usr/sbin/pppd proxyarp noauth pty "ssh home -p 22 -C -2 '/usr/sbin/pppd
proxyarp notty noauth 192.168.100.20:192.168.100.21'"
192.168.100.21:192.168.100.
I have a problem at work because they have turned off nearly all our
ports outgoing as well as incoming
what I would like to do is this...
HOME
Linux box running a vncserver
|
|
|
CABLE MODEM
|
|
|
Firewall at work
It occurs to me that I've been sloppy (if not outright
incorrect) with my terminology so maybe (an attempt at)
some clarification is in order.
Let's call Dan's desktop machine (with the X server)
machineX - this is the machine where Dan wants to
initiate the SSH connection from and which has the
[...]
> X11Forwardingyes
> X11DisplayOffset 10
>
> ...and you want to be sure that those capabilities
> aren't being overridden in the /etc/default/ssh files,
> which are read by the SSH daemons on startup.
This is one of the really great discussions, the kind of thing
which can s
Michael ODonnell wrote:
Well, I have had no problem with this when interacting with other
flavors of Linux or even FreeBSD. So I'm certain it is not my
local system that's the problem.
I'm using ssh to connect remotely like this:
ssh -XCA -l mylogin remote.system.name
OK - so you're instr
> Well, I have had no problem with this when interacting with other
> flavors of Linux or even FreeBSD. So I'm certain it is not my
> local system that's the problem.
>
> I'm using ssh to connect remotely like this:
>
> ssh -XCA -l mylogin remote.system.name
OK - so you're instructing the SSH
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 14:44, Dan Coutu wrote:
> I tried Cole's suggestion of installing xbase-clients but that didn't do
> it. I had been thinking
> that perhaps I needed to start with a remote environment that already
> had a valid DISPLAY
> defined because it was a workstation. Can anyone verif
Michael ODonnell wrote:
The biggest burr in my butt so far has been trying to get
the systems so that I can use X applications (like xemacs) on
the servers that display back to my desktop via an SSH tunnel.
The servers do not have X installed on them because they're not
workstations. But it sure
> The biggest burr in my butt so far has been trying to get
> the systems so that I can use X applications (like xemacs) on
> the servers that display back to my desktop via an SSH tunnel.
> The servers do not have X installed on them because they're not
> workstations. But it sure would be nice
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 13:18, Dan Coutu wrote:
> Paul Lussier wrote:
> The biggest burr in my butt so far has been trying to get the systems so
> that I can use X
> applications (like xemacs) on the servers that display back to my
> desktop via an SSH
> tunnel. The servers do not have X installed
Paul Lussier wrote:
In a message dated: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:51:32 EST
Dan Coutu said:
It seems like the only distribution not in turmoil lately is Debian
and they are just really really slow. (I know, they like to
say they're 'stable'.)
I've never been bothered by Debian's release cycle.
In a message dated: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 10:50:23 EST
"Ken D'Ambrosio" said:
> I have a local Debian repository I rsync nightly -- which allows for
> _really_ fast net installs -- and so forth and so on. Will it bake
> brownies for me? No. Is it the easiest to install, or the best at
> hardware de
> But Debian's whole process --
> and apt-get's ease-of-use -- is really, really hard to argue with.
I know this has also been said a hundred times before.. but apt is NOT the
packaging system deb is.. you can get apt for Redhat and use it with RPMS...
up2date (if you pay for it) works kind of lik
> I've never been bothered by Debian's release cycle. I run
> Debian/Testing on my desktop with Debian/Stable on my servers. If I
> need a newer version of package on my stable servers, it's usually
> available from backports.org.
I know that this has all been hashed out before, but I'm going to
On Mon, 2003-11-03 at 17:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, all. It's come to my attention that the only real reason I can't just
> outright dump Outlook on my end-users' machines is because of calendaring.
[snip]
> So: I'm looking for something, server-side, that's RFC 2445 (iCal)
> compliant, t
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 17:20:27 -0500 (EST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, all. It's come to my attention that the only real reason I can't just
> outright dump Outlook on my end-users' machines is because of calendaring.
> Furthermore -- regardless of platform -- it would be super-duper handy to
>
The thing that's got me confused is... what's Novell planning on doing?
First Ximian, now SuSE -- where are they going? Are they trying to be a
Linux powerhouse? If so, why? What do they intend to do with Netware?
Maybe an attempt to coalesce them? Or is this yet another in a long
string of b
On 3 Nov 2003, at 1:13pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My digital camera does 1 minute movie clips. However, it writes them as
> .MOV files, which I can only seem to view with Quicktime (even though the
> manual says that they are "Motion JPEG" files). Does anyone know how I can
> convert these file
> announcement had left me thinking that maybe SuSe would be a good
> choice for the distribution to switch to.
I've been playing around with Suse 9.0 and I can confirm
that it doesn't suck.
> It seems like the only distribution not in turmoil lately is Debian
> and they are just really reall
In a message dated: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:51:32 EST
Dan Coutu said:
>It seems like the only distribution not in turmoil lately is Debian
>and they are just really really slow. (I know, they like to
>say they're 'stable'.)
I've never been bothered by Debian's release cycle. I run
Debian/Testing on
Dan Coutu said:
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 09:40, Michael ODonnell wrote:
>> http://www.suse.com/us/company/press/press_releases/archive03/novell_suse.html
>
> This is pretty interesting. Now couple this with Red Hat's announcement
> yesterday that they were discontinuing the ordinary Red Hat Linux
>
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 09:51:32 -0500
Dan Coutu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 09:40, Michael ODonnell wrote:
> > http://www.suse.com/us/company/press/press_releases/archive03/novell_suse.html
>
> This is pretty interesting. Now couple this with Red Hat's announcement
> yesterda
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Dan Coutu wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 09:40, Michael ODonnell wrote:
> > http://www.suse.com/us/company/press/press_releases/archive03/novell_suse.html
>
> This is pretty interesting. Now couple this with Red Hat's announcement
> yesterday that they were discontinuing the
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 09:40, Michael ODonnell wrote:
> http://www.suse.com/us/company/press/press_releases/archive03/novell_suse.html
This is pretty interesting. Now couple this with Red Hat's announcement
yesterday that they were discontinuing the ordinary Red Hat Linux
distribution and only sel
Are you referring to linux from scratch type of place?
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/
Also another place with some good resources is BYO Linux
http://www.byolinux.org/
Hope that is what you are looking for.
Derek Doucette
http://derek.homeunix.org
Paul Lussier said:
>
> Hi all,
>
> At one tim
Hi all,
At one time I could have sworn there was a HOWTO on how to build your
own Linux Distro. Now, even with the help of google, I can't find any
such thing. Maybe I'm searching on the wrong thing. Anyway, does
anyone know where I can find docs on building a Linux distro? (extra
points for b
http://www.suse.com/us/company/press/press_releases/archive03/novell_suse.html
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
Try this, it is not free but it runs on Linux and supports a variety of
clients including Ximian Evolution.
SUSE LINUX
Openexchange Server 4.1
http://www.suse.com/us/business/products/openexchange/
Take care Rich
Richard A Sharpe
(DBA) Sqlserver/DB2
Amherst Technologies
40 Continental Blvd
28 matches
Mail list logo
