I think I just found a broken Mandrake tool: drakfont
If you use Mandrake, you might want to be careful in using it to install
TrueType fonts. I just tried to install a bunch from my collections
and... xfs (ergo, X) refused to start after that.
I'm currently Not Pleased.
For anyone interest
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 14:29, Jason wrote:
> I have a client in MN who uses qwest as his isp. I host his site and email
> and until yesterday at 3 pm he was able to send and receive just fine. His
> POP address is domain.com and his smtp address was something.qwest.net. In
> his calls to qwest he is
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 11:13:58AM -0500, Randy Edwards wrote:
In my warped worldview, there are only two distros: Debian and Red Hat.
Sure, there are lots of other really slick distros (e.g. Lycoris), but
what I'm interested in is software -- usually the software that isn't
included in th
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 03:56:05PM -0500, Bill Sconce wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2004 09:58:36 -0500
> brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > However, I've been thinking recently of switching to a different distro,
> > mostly for "because" reasons and partially to just try other things.
> > I've also got
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> Also, SuSE is relatively strong financially being part of Novell.
> Mandrake was recently in the French bankruptcy court, [...]
FWIW, Mandrake just reported it's first quarter in the black:
http://www.newsforge.com/business/04/01/22/1249249.shtml?tid=2
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, brian wrote:
Brian, I second Brian's motion; here is another recommendation for
Mandrake. :)
> Been using Redhat for years (still have my 5.0 installation CD's and
> diskette from Redhat (am on 9.0 currently)).
As Mandrake is an RPM-based distro, you should feel right at ho
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 15:43, brian wrote:
> In my experience, you have to allow login or plain AUTH with lookout.
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised they would use login AUTH - the least
documented method I found. There's not a standard or an RFC so far as I
can tell. 8)
Although, I do already
On 22 Jan 2004 09:58:36 -0500
brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I've been thinking recently of switching to a different distro,
> mostly for "because" reasons and partially to just try other things.
> I've also got a fair amount of Debian experience, FWIW.
I recommend you check into L
In my experience, you have to allow login or plain AUTH with lookout.
Most default setups in Sendmail tend to prefer CRAM and/or DIGEST MD5.
The SSL thing is completely different. The problem comes down to
LookOut sucks and doesn't support any modern secure login mechanisms
(lets see a show of h
Hi Jason,
I'd like to ask some questions to clarify the situation and make it easier for
the experts on this list to help you. My knowledge is limited to getting my
RH 8 sendmail configured to send email via my local ISP's SMTP server. It
seems there is more and more checking being added to S
> I have a client in MN who uses qwest as his isp. I host his site and email
> and until yesterday at 3 pm he was able to send and receive just fine. His
> POP address is domain.com and his smtp address was something.qwest.net. In
> his calls to qwest he is getting the usual runaround "you can't
>
Hi folks - I'm running into a problem that I was hoping somebody might
have some ideas on.
I'm running a debian server box with exim on it. I've set up exim to
require tls smtp authentication if they want to relay. At this point,
it works just hunky dory with evolution, but outlook (and outlook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22 Jan 2004 09:58:36 -0500
brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Been using Redhat for years (still have my 5.0 installation CD's and
> diskette from Redhat (am on 9.0 currently)).
>
> Some would consider this a character flaw, I know, and don't real
All,
I have a client in MN who uses qwest as his isp. I host his site and email
and until yesterday at 3 pm he was able to send and receive just fine. His
POP address is domain.com and his smtp address was something.qwest.net. In
his calls to qwest he is getting the usual runaround "you can't just
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 09:58, brian wrote:
> Been using Redhat for years (still have my 5.0 installation CD's and
> diskette from Redhat (am on 9.0 currently)).
>
> Some would consider this a character flaw, I know, and don't really
> care.
>
> However, I've been thinking recently of switching to
Some would consider this a character flaw, I know, and
Don't worry about it; there are far worse character flaws... :-)
However, I've been thinking recently of switching to a different distro,
mostly for "because" reasons and partially to just try other things.
I've also got a fair amount of D
brian wrote:
Been using Redhat for years (still have my 5.0 installation CD's and
diskette from Redhat (am on 9.0 currently)).
[snip]
My major wants/needs are:
Support for my dual-head ATI card
Gnome out-of-the-box (preferred)
Some degree of mutli-media support ("stereophonic beeps" are usually
On Thu, 2004-01-22 at 09:58, brian wrote:
>...
> My major wants/needs are:
> Support for my dual-head ATI card
Isn't this more dependent on the version of XFree86 than on the
distribution?
> Gnome out-of-the-box (preferred)
> Some degree of mutli-media support ("stereophonic bee
Been using Redhat for years (still have my 5.0 installation CD's and
diskette from Redhat (am on 9.0 currently)).
Some would consider this a character flaw, I know, and don't really
care.
However, I've been thinking recently of switching to a different distro,
mostly for "because" reasons and par
19 matches
Mail list logo
