Re: [ON Topic] How 'bout them Linux? Ain't they somethin?!

2004-02-02 Thread Richard Soule
Michael ODonnell wrote: What an opportunity to embarrass yourself! Might also be good preparation for a job interview... More or less, this is how I got my job at Oracle. An Oracle sales consulting director came to UNH to help troubleshoot an Oracle issue on a machine. I think it was something a

Re: [ON Topic] How 'bout them Linux? Ain't they somethin?!

2004-02-02 Thread bmcculley
>> Something that might be kind of fun would be to 'sort of break' >> a linux installation (mis-configure something, 'degrade' a needed >> library, etc.) and then have folks 'try to figure it out'. >> Just the experience of watching folks go through the various >> possibilities and applying their

Re: [ON Topic] How 'bout them Linux? Ain't they somethin?!

2004-02-02 Thread Michael ODonnell
> Something that might be kind of fun would be to 'sort of break' > a linux installation (mis-configure something, 'degrade' a needed > library, etc.) and then have folks 'try to figure it out'. > Just the experience of watching folks go through the various > possibilities and applying their tro

Re: named madness

2004-02-02 Thread Joshua S. Freeman
Thanks! As it turned out, I'd failed to list the dns servers for this domain with my registrar (Joker.com).. that was part of the problem... I was able to fix the local problem (the one related to an unexpected EOF) by copying over a known working .hosts file and editing it... Thanks for your

Re: [ON Topic] How 'bout them Linux? Ain't they somethin?!

2004-02-02 Thread Richard Soule
Paul's email got me thinking... His commment about 'figuring something out' really hit home because recently I've run into situations where consultants have 'solved the wrong problem' for some big clients. We often see two kinds of 'good' consultants out there: 1) The kind with great experience an

Re: MyDoom (was: Test)

2004-02-02 Thread Michael ODonnell
>> This is going to happen; it is only a question of when. > > Considering this list is public, archived, and searchable via > Google, I now give it a week or two until someone sees this and > combines it with perl's MIME::Lite and Email::Simple modules ;) Although I (think I) get Ben's genera

Re: MyDoom (was: Test)

2004-02-02 Thread Travis Roy
> > In a message dated: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:27:39 EST > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > >> This took me 25 minutes, > > I hope your boss isn't reading this list ;) This is funny, because he is reading the list.. (BTW Tom, this only took 2 minutes) ___ gnhlug

Re: MyDoom (was: Test)

2004-02-02 Thread Mark Komarinski
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 12:34:37PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, at 10:52am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> It is worth pointing out that, like most such malware, the MyDoom worm > >> forges the "From" address. > > > > SPF would prevent a lot of this from happening, strange

Re: MyDoom (was: Test)

2004-02-02 Thread Paul Lussier
In a message dated: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 12:27:39 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > This took me 25 minutes, I hope your boss isn't reading this list ;) > This is going to happen; it is only a question of when. Considering this list is public, archived, and searchable via Google, I now give it a wee

Re: MyDoom (was: Test)

2004-02-02 Thread bscott
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, at 10:52am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> It is worth pointing out that, like most such malware, the MyDoom worm >> forges the "From" address. > > SPF would prevent a lot of this from happening, strangely enough. True, but then the malware will just switch back to using the

Re: MyDoom (was: Test)

2004-02-02 Thread bscott
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, at 10:52am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> The reason this is significant is that there is absolutely no technical >> reason that this worm could not exist in the Macintosh or Unix worlds. > > For now I think it would be technically hard for this to happen. #!/bin/sh # MyDoom fo

Re: MyDoom (was: Test)

2004-02-02 Thread Mark Komarinski
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 10:33:50AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 16:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available. > > On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, at 11:04pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Is this the MyDoom worm/virus? > > Yup. > >

MyDoom (was: Test)

2004-02-02 Thread bscott
> On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 16:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Mail transaction failed. Partial message is available. On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, at 11:04pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is this the MyDoom worm/virus? Yup. It is worth pointing out that, like most such malware, the MyDoom worm forges the

Re: named madness

2004-02-02 Thread bscott
On Sat, 31 Jan 2004, at 7:21pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://monica.threeofus.com/gmi/xstatichost.txt. You need to put the opening parenthesis [(] of the SOA record on the same line as the start of the record. You can keep the other parameters, and the closing parenthesis [)], on separate

Server Report

2004-02-02 Thread travis
The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment. <>