On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:55:15PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So the best thing is keep your address off the radar, like
> Derek's managed to do.
It's a very effective strategy, but it's a bit difficult to maintain.
If you have friends or relatives who are not security savvy, and use
Micr
>From: Derek Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >Create a little gif or jpg image that displays your email
>> >address.
>> Won't work as "mailto:"; link
>
>Sure it will. But you shouldn't use it anyway, because the
>scanning bots will surely look for mailto: links.
>
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 02:57:06PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >Create a little gif or jpg image that displays your email
> address.
> >
>
> Won't work as "mailto:"; link
Sure it will. But you shouldn't use it anyway, because the scanning
bots will surely look for mailto: links.
ma
Check out the contact page off of my web site:
http://www.mv.com/ipusers/ke1g/emform.html
It's a form that invokes a cgi program (provided by my ISP,
but I'm sure that you can do something similar) that allows me, among
other things, to send myself an email containing the data
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 13:57, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
> 1: I wouldn't be surprised if spammers strip out "+detail" from their
>list of email addresses, either to be more annoying or else to
>increase the size of their "unique email list".
>
I know of at least one marketing company that does
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, Tilly, Lawrence wrote:
> Now, I've heard of bots similar to what search engines use that crawl
> the web and scour for email addresses on web sites. It sounds very
> reasonable of a tactic and if it doesn't actually happen now I'm sure it
> will very soon. I have also heard
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 14:27, Tilly, Lawrence wrote:
> I want to provide my email address so that visitors that do not
> already know the login info can drop me a line to request it (giving
> me the chance to be sure I know who is getting it).
I can see two options for you. Before I dive in let me
>
>Create a little gif or jpg image that displays your email
address.
>
Won't work as "mailto:"; link
(and might be too complicated for those who *really* *need* a
simple point and click interface!)
Question, would a form entry be an acceptable alternative?
It's what came to mind for me first.
Marc Nozell writes:
> Create a little gif or jpg image that displays your email address.
The downside of this scheme is that it makes the site inaccessable to
those who are visually impared.
Regards,
--kevin
--
Kevin D. Clark / Cetacean Networks / Portsmouth, N.H. (USA)
cetaceannetworks.com!k
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 02:27:44PM -0500, Tilly, Lawrence wrote:
> Now, I've heard of bots similar to what search engines use that crawl
> the web and scour for email addresses on web sites.
Create a little gif or jpg image that displays your email address.
-marc
--
Marc Nozell <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Title: Can this be protected?
I am putting up some web sites, primarily for personal use. Some parts of the site require a user to login and so I have no problem with posting semi-private info in there. However, on the "front page" I want to provide my email address so that visitors that do
Jeff Macdonald writes:
> It is most annoying when sign up forms
> don't allow + as I use it as a way to tag my address with a vendor's
> name (ie [EMAIL PROTECTED] for Palm). If mail comes from somewhere besides
> the vendor - well, then you know he sold your address.
Two comments:
1: I wouldn'
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the link! That is interesting...
Mike
--
- Original Message -
DATE: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:58:10
From: "Peter Finlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
>There was a small article in EE Times, I think, (
On Thu, 2004-03-25 at 11:02, Derek Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:55:20AM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> > =>Does anyone have any more specific information than that?
> >
> > AFAIK it's not a thingy that was slipped in. It really is a standard part
> > of the email addressing scheme. I
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 10:55:20AM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> =>Does anyone have any more specific information than that?
>
> AFAIK it's not a thingy that was slipped in. It really is a standard part
> of the email addressing scheme. It's possible to disable it but why would
> you?
No, I'm p
On Thursday, Mar 25th 2004 at 10:23 -0500, quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
=>
=>I'm looking for the definingin moment in history where someone
=>realized/thought/came up with the idea that allowing 'user+detail'
=>in e-mail addresses was a good idea.
=>
=>Someone mentioned they first saw it in relation
I'm looking for the definingin moment in history where someone
realized/thought/came up with the idea that allowing 'user+detail'
in e-mail addresses was a good idea.
Someone mentioned they first saw it in relation to CMU addresses
in the early '80s, which makes me think it came from Andrew Mail
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, at 7:19pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Trying to help my daughter research a paper on biometrics and
> nanotechnology in relation to homeland security...and possible civil right
> infringements...
http://www.google.com/search?q=biometrics+homeland+security
http://www.google.co
There was a small article in EE Times, I think, (in the last year) that
described military uses. It described dusting an advanced area or
perimeter with a hierarchy of:
Lots of pressure and heat sensors that relay to less number of
accumulators that relay to alarm transmitters.
http://www.eetimes
19 matches
Mail list logo
