Thanks. This should give me some direction to complete that section. I
also found a few sites and quotes.
On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 20:55:06 -0400
Jon maddog Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > I'm doing a presentation on Linux for a group on Monday night and I
> >
Jerry,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I'm doing a presentation on Linux for a group on Monday night and I am
> struggling with "The Future of Linux" topic. I tend to look at things more in
> a what is rather than a what will be perspective. Could you help me out a bit
> on this, possibly by pointing me
On Jul 31, 2004, at 16:57, c.e.smith wrote:
configure error no acceptable cc found in $path
I can find NO refference to this in the docs
does anyone have any insight??
Sounds like you didn't install the "Development" bundle when you
re-installed RedHat.
You've got a real compelling reason to run
Jeff,
To be clear, SCO does not own the trademark of Unixware.
The Open Group owns both the trademarks "Unix" and "Unixware".
Please see:
http://www.unix.org/what_is_unix.html
Warmest regards,
md
--
Jon "maddog" Hall
Executive Director Linux(R) International
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks like this is a bug in openssh, or at least a misfeature:
The workaround seems to be to use publickey auth and ssh-agent:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=222992
I haven't tried it myself. I hope it works - I used to use remote
copies with ftp back in the day before they "sec
Seems as though I had a bad install last weekend so so now a new fresh
install of 5.1 (redhat)
and an uncompressed version of samba 3.0.5 now when i issue the command
./configure from the source directory of samba i get an error mesage:
checking for gcc..no
checking for cc.no
co
Fred -
SCO didn't buy out Caldera, SCO sold the name, Unixware and
Unix system V business (not necessarily the copyrights, etc
- that's a subject of several lawsuits) to Caldera, and SCO
changed their name to Tarantella. About the same time,
Ransom Love left Caldera, current admin came in, and
ev
Fred wrote:
In the meantime, some serious thought needs to be given to doing to
search engines what has been done for file-sharing. How to query
thousands if not millions of little search engines all over the globe to
retrieve content, rather than relying on one huge centralised facility
such as G
Please don't top-post; it makes maintaining context in replies very
difficult.
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:21:35AM -0400, Ted Roche wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2004, at 5:18 PM, Fred wrote:
>
> >The link is on the Webmin application itself -- a link to "Home" which
> >takes you directly to the SCO site.
>
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 04:59:12PM -0400, Fred wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 14:57, Derek Martin wrote:
>
> > Sure, but the point is to run /Webmin/ on a non-standard port... If
> > people are trying to exploit a bug in Webmin, they're going to go
> > looking for it on the default Webmin port, n
Ok, now I see it. Perhaps I missed it before because I have Google
configured to list 100 search results per page, and it's a long scroll
to the bottom...
Ok, off to the Thought Contagion presses...
About being outraged, I am annoyed too, but not surprised. Expect this
sort of thing to happen whe
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 18:08, ksandre wrote:
> Kurth Bemis wrote:
>
> >
> > I wasn't aware that Google was doing this? Anybody else see this?
>
>
> "DMCA STRIKES AGAIN: SOME 2600.COM PAGES REMOVED FROM GOOGLE
> Posted 7 Jul 2004 08:41:29 UTC"
>
> http://207.99.30.226/news/view/article/1981
>
That's strange - I don't see that on mine, also version 1.150. After
logging into the web site, I see "Feedback" and "Log out" in the upper
right corner.
On Jul 30, 2004, at 5:18 PM, Fred wrote:
The link is on the Webmin application itself -- a link to "Home" which
takes you directly to the SCO
13 matches
Mail list logo
