I was developing a CD-ROM product which contains multiple Microsoft
PowerPointless (tm) presentations. The CD would launch an html Table of
Contents page using auto-run. To make the TOC page layout the same as
the .ppt files, I simply created a slide in PowerPoint with appropriate
links to th
Greg Rundlett wrote:
My site was owned and defaced. It looks like the mediawiki script
that I recently installed to create a free-software community may have
opened the 'door' to the site being compromised. This is unconfirmed
however.
I ruled out the possibility of mediawiki being the one to
In case you missed it...
People are often looking for Linux work-alikes for MS Exchange Server.
Novell just announced that they are making SUSE OpenExchange GPL. This
should mean lots of good things, and faster adoption.
http://mirror.open-xchange.org/ox/EN/community/
Also, there is a project
On Aug 12, 2004, at 14:43, Bill Freeman wrote:
Just for grins I tried holding C while it booted. No
difference. (I get a chord played rather than what I'd call a ding or
dong.) Might you know how to ask the OS whether it believes that it
has a CD?
Does it sound like this:
http://www.tc
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:56:48 -0400
Cole Tuininga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to be more secure, you could always have /tmp be a tmpfs
> (aka a ram disk). Then the data is never stored on a hard drive
> anyway.
>
> Well, excluding swap I suppose. Nevermind.
I would think that this
> On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 12:53, Fred wrote:
>> How is "wipe" any different from "shred", which is already on your
>> linux system?
>
> Dunno. Could be that they're basically the same.
>
>> I keep my /tmp partition as ext2 for that sole reason. Anything
>> sensitive goes there, and I can shred it af
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 12:53, Fred wrote:
> How is "wipe" any different from "shred", which is already on your linux
> system?
Dunno. Could be that they're basically the same.
> I keep my /tmp partition as ext2 for that sole reason. Anything
> sensitive goes there, and I can shred it afterwards.
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 09:46, Cole Tuininga wrote:
> Essentially, just use it like any other shell command:
>
> # wipe filename
>
> # wipe file1 file2 filebase*
>
> # wipe directory
>
> > expected results
>
> Wipe attempts to overwrite the file several times with different binary
> patterns, t
On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 21:37, c.e.smith wrote:
> The Samba Problems are solved it turns out that the nick card was going bad
> at first I could ping out then later I could do nothing I was getting no
> ping return when checking from the rest of the network even though it picked
> up a dhcp address
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004 21:37:04 -0400
"c.e.smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Samba Problems are solved it turns out that the nick card was going bad
> at first I could ping out then later I could do nothing I was getting no
> ping return when checking from the rest of the network even though i
On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 09:38, John Malloy wrote:
> Has anyone out there had experience with the wipe utility?
> on the web:
>
> http://wipe.sourceforge.net/
>
> I am running on Solaris 7 (sparc)
> What I was wondering is:
>
> command syntax
Essentially, just use it like any other shell command:
Derek Martin wrote:
Finally, geeks tend to be (in my experience, anyway) a bit more
idealistic than the average non-techie.
heh.
In case you missed it, this UFie is worth the look:
"Different takes on [F911]"
http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20040711&mode=classic
12 matches
Mail list logo
