Benjamin Scott wrote:
I was asked off-list about spam backscatter and joe-jobs. Rather then
make a private reply that only helps one person, I'm posting a public one
that will hopefully inform many.
Thank you for a clear, concise explanation suitable for a wide audience.
I plan on keeping this
I'm guessing this is the real reason...
Original message
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 12:17:09 -0500
From: Bill Mullen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Years ago, before online banking existed, [...]
We had the same policy then for the account
history data that we made available to the tellers
over the
Hi,
Do any of the gnome based tools support text select. Acroreader 5
does, but I was hoping something that's native to Fedora would support
it to. I just want to be able to copy and past some text.
--
Jeff Macdonald
Ayer, MA
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing
Fred wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 12:17, Bill Mullen wrote:
I suspect that the real issue here is merely one of storage space; by
setting a fixed period for which they will make data available (last 90
days, last 3 statement periods, whatever), they can move enough
transactions out of the
Anybody agree with the following statement?
The HELO domain represents the mail provider used by the author of the
message and thus is more closely related to the author than any other
header within the message.
This is from the CSV doc to the FTC. Is is just mean, or does this
seem to ignore
Jeff Macdonald wrote:
Anybody agree with the following statement?
The HELO domain represents the mail provider used by the author of the
message and thus is more closely related to the author than any other
header within the message.
This is from the CSV doc to the FTC. Is is just mean, or does
Jeff Macdonald wrote:
Anybody agree with the following statement?
The HELO domain represents the mail provider used by the author of the
message and thus is more closely related to the author than any other
header within the message.
This is from the CSV doc to the FTC. Is is just mean, or does
I was a bit too quick on the reply, the HELO in the mail header is from
the first mail server which accepts the message. Subsequent hops don't
change the initial HELO. However, I do have mail servers which have to
rewrite headers and provide a specific domain in a HELO for mail to be
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:18:20 -0500, Dan Jenkins wrote:
I was a bit too quick on the reply, the HELO in the mail header is from
the first mail server which accepts the message. Subsequent hops don't
change the initial HELO.
I must re-read the RFCs. I was not under the impression this was so.
