Decoding Microsoft (Outlook) Attachments

2004-12-07 Thread Greg Rundlett
Around this time of year, people share a lot of photos. Pictures of friends, family, the kids, their pets, their Christmas trees etc. The problem is that many of these people are chained to a Microsoft email empire, and thus using email software that a) writes html-formatted (or Rich Text)

Re: NAT w/o firewall?

2004-12-07 Thread Chris Brenton
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 11:44, Michael ODonnell wrote: > > let's say I have a simple home network with a > combination of machines behind a Linux box that's > doing NAT/firewall duty. If I rigged that NAT box > such that it'd allow establishment of no inbound > connections of any kind but forwarded

Re: NAT w/o firewall?

2004-12-07 Thread Cole Tuininga
I can't speak for anybody else, but for me that's the majority of how I do my setup. The only port open on my NAT box is ssh and since I have that locked down pretty well on the application side, I don't firewall it out (though I probably should). Beyond keeping your kernel up to date for exploi

NAT w/o firewall?

2004-12-07 Thread Michael ODonnell
I only know enough about networking to be dangerous, so out of morbid curiousity (and also to stimulate discussion) I'd be interested in comments about the (lack of) security in the following arrangement: let's say I have a simple home network with a combination of machines behind a Linux box tha

Re: Wireless *switch*?

2004-12-07 Thread Cole Tuininga
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 11:20, Matt Brodeur wrote: >That should be it. If you ignore the WAN side of these devices > they're nothing more than a combined access point and 4+ port switch. > You just want to make sure that the router's DHCP is disabled so that > your existing DHCP server will be t

Re: Wireless *switch*?

2004-12-07 Thread Cole Tuininga
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 11:14, Michael ODonnell wrote: > My (very simple) > net is arranged similarly to the one described by the OP: > > cableModem -- firewall/NAT -- switch -- everythingElse > > ...and I'd been assuming that the wireless access point > box could go on the everythingElse side of

Re: Wireless *switch*?

2004-12-07 Thread Matt Brodeur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 10:10:07AM -0500, Cole Tuininga wrote: > I don't have a lot of experience with wireless access points, but I'd > gotten the impression that most (if not all?) of them act as a router. > For instance, the one I have right now g

Re: Wireless *switch*?

2004-12-07 Thread Michael ODonnell
I thought that at its simplest a wireless access point could be thought of as just another switch or a hub, ie. it just connects one or more Enet interfaces into a network. Everything else (bridging, routing, NATing, DHCP, etc) should work the same for a wireless connection as for a wired connec

Re: Wireless *switch*?

2004-12-07 Thread Travis Roy
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 10:07, Travis Roy wrote: a Wireless access point is really not much more then a bridge. Most do come with NAT stuff but you can switch that off. Both my Apple Airport (old one), the Linksys at work, and the D-Link in our other work location have this option. Just make sur

Re: Wireless *switch*?

2004-12-07 Thread Cole Tuininga
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 10:07, Travis Roy wrote: > a Wireless access point is really not much more then a bridge. Most do > come with NAT stuff but you can switch that off. Both my Apple Airport > (old one), the Linksys at work, and the D-Link in our other work > location have this option. > > Ju

Re: Wireless *switch*?

2004-12-07 Thread Cole Tuininga
On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 09:38, Mark Komarinski wrote: > If I read this right, you're looking for an access point? An access point that allows the connecting machines to become part of an existing class C... More details: I have an internal network at home of 192.168.101.0/24. What I'd like is to

Re: Wireless *switch*?

2004-12-07 Thread Travis Roy
a Wireless access point is really not much more then a bridge. Most do come with NAT stuff but you can switch that off. Both my Apple Airport (old one), the Linksys at work, and the D-Link in our other work location have this option. Just make sure it's JUST an access point and not a wireless "

Re: Wireless *switch*?

2004-12-07 Thread Mark Komarinski
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:25:59AM -0500, Cole Tuininga wrote: > > Hi all - I have a sort of random question for you. I currently have a > wireless router at home for use for my laptop and any guests that come > over. However, what I'd really like to do is to have the router act > more like a pl

Wireless *switch*?

2004-12-07 Thread Cole Tuininga
Hi all - I have a sort of random question for you. I currently have a wireless router at home for use for my laptop and any guests that come over. However, what I'd really like to do is to have the router act more like a plain 'ole switch. I'd like the wireless devices that hook up to be a part