sorry for the top-post
here's the problem: GATEWAY=192.168.1.98
it should be 192.168.1.1 (default)
dns server in /etc/resolv.conf should also be 192.168.1.1
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:28 -0400, Tatara wrote:
Frank, my system-config-network screens are shown at the bottom.
Scott, my computer is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin D. Clark) writes:
> It especially tests the drives, just like you orginally asked for.
True, and I suppose with smartd enabled, syslog would be a good
indicator of drive errors.
> BTW, many of the folks I work with use these:
>
>http://www.thermotron.com/products/ben
Anybody here got 802.3ad running? If so, which kernel
are you running and what switch are you using?
I've got an RHAT box (RHEL4AS with a 2.6.9 kernel
plus a raft of RHAT patches) trying to dance the
LACP dance with an Extreme (brand) switch that
seems to work OK with Windows as the 802.3ad clie
On Aug 25, 2005, at 11:24, Paul Lussier wrote:
One idea that comes to mind is this:
(while /bin/true ; do sync ; sleep 3 ; done) &
cd /usr/src/linux
while /bin/true ; do make clean && make -j 4 all modules ; done
This doesn't really test that much though, cpu, disk i/o, maybe some
memory, but
Paul Lussier writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin D. Clark) writes:
>> (while /bin/true ; do sync ; sleep 3 ; done) &
>> cd /usr/src/linux
>> while /bin/true ; do make clean && make -j 4 all modules ; done
>
> This doesn't really test that much though, cpu, disk i/o, maybe some
> memory, but compl
Benjamin Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I've use memtest86 to exercise RAM, system bus, and, to a lesser
>extent, the CPU. For hard disks, I use "badblocks -v -s -w". For
Hmmm, I had forgotten about badblocks. Thanks :) Of course,
presumably mke2fs -c does essentially the same thin
Jim Kuzdrall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The military has found thermal cycling as the best way to accelerate
> these failures if they are going to happen. Thermal cycling is just as
> effective with the power off, greatly reducing the cost. It is also
> relatively fast. You can comple
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin D. Clark) writes:
> Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Does anyone here have any experience with creating system burn-in
>> suites?
>
> One idea that comes to mind is this:
>
> (while /bin/true ; do sync ; sleep 3 ; done) &
> cd /usr/src/linux
> while /bin/tru
Benjamin Scott writes:
> And they still haven't figured out how to release a proper Windoze
> drivers (one that doesn't have syntax violations for the RIS INF
> parser).
What's that? (RIS INF parser)
Goggling this tells me that it is some sort of Remote Installation
Service, but more than that
>> It seems that either will do the job, I'm just wondering (for the
>> purpose of my own "betterment" and improved knowledge of shell scripting
>> *grin*) about advantages of either approach. The only one I've come
>> with so far is that Solution 2 requires a separate process to run.
>
>So does
Oop, Missed one, on the line :
HOSTNAME=redline
Instead of "redline" use your PC's Hostname.
--
speech recognition software was used in the composition of this e-mail
Jeff Kinz, Emergent Research, Hudson, MA.
¡Ya no mas!
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:28:11PM -0400, Tatara wrote:
> $ cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
> DEVICE=eth0
> BOOTPROTO=none
> BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
> IPADDR=192.168.1.98
> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> NETWORK=192.168.1.0
> ONBOOT=yes
> USERCTL=no
> PEERDNS=no
> TYPE=Ethernet
Hi Eric,
Y
***
Dartmouth-Lake Sunapee Linux Users Group
http://www.dlslug.org/
***
The next regular monthly meeting of the DLSLUG will be held:
13 matches
Mail list logo
