I added their cache card to my S1 DTiVo and have no trouble with it...
someone said it requires more 'hacking' than others... I would say it
was all pretty easy. At the same time.. I replaced the 40G with a 120G
drive.. put in the network/cache card and 512 of ram.. and installed the
web server s
On Dec 12, 2005, at 10:27 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
Indeed. I've been to my mind once or twice; it's a scary place.
Yeah, but I've been out of my mind once or twice, and that's pretty
scary, too.
Ken: RSVP! Looking forward to the meeting.
___
gnhlug
Hi All,
I'm having an issue with a PAM-aware authentication module I've written,
but only in x64 versions of Linux. I will attempt to explain in detail
our issue regarding PAM and x64 Linux distros.
Our product in Java needs to authenticate based on OS users. To
accomplish this, we determin
Travis Roy wrote:
Right, I don't really see the point of any kind of connection for a S1
DTiVo.. It's not used for guide data, you still can't order PPV via the
remote, and there's no HMO for S1 TiVo's of any kind.
Without the network card, I don't know how I'd be able to use the
tivoweb ser
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 06:31:34PM -0500, mike ledoux wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 04:42:40PM -0500, Jeff Macdonald wrote:
> > On 12/12/05, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > -- Ben "Caveat Emptor" Scott
> >
> > Oh, if you own a TiVo Series 1, do your homework before dumping your
> > l
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 01:41:18PM -0500, Mark Komarinski wrote:
> I want to test out the FC5 test 1 without trashing my existing
> installation, which leads me to using a virual machine of some sort.
> I'm currently running FC4.
>
> I know of the following:
>
> VMWare 4: Can't find virtual disk
Mark Komarinski wrote:
Tivo2Go is really nice too. Along with the HME apps like Galleon.
Anyone get that to work with Linux? ...its the only OS in our house.
Cheers!
Ty
--
Tyson D Sawyer
46CM '85 Reynard 85F "The Red Headed Stepchild"
118AM '72 Tui Super-V 2002
37DS '98 Neon ACR
Configuration documentation can be found at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/Linux-PAM-html/pam.html application developers (using PAM) can be found at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/Linux-PAM-html/pam_appl.html
These include example sources to reference, etc.
For your
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 12:08:54PM -0500, mike ledoux wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 10:47:15AM -0500, Mark Komarinski wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 06:31:34PM -0500, mike ledoux wrote:
> > > Roughly $70 solves the problem forever, just plug the TiVo into your
> > > home network:
> > >
> >
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 11:02:04AM -0500, Tyson Sawyer wrote:
> Mark Komarinski wrote:
> >Tivo2Go is really nice too. Along with the HME apps like Galleon.
>
> Anyone get that to work with Linux? ...its the only OS in our house.
Yes. More recent versions are a lot better to get running even on
Well, in the run up to the apparently much anticipated disucussion this week on DNS/BIND and all things namey related, I pose this question:Does anyone know of or have access to any studies or numbers comparing the performance of BIND 9 vs. Windows 200x DNS servers?
I'm looking for real study type
mike ledoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Most likely, my replacement for this TiVo will be a nice MythTV box
> with a couple of HD tuners, but I probably won't bother until SD
> broadcasts become unavailable.
Do you mean HD in that last sentence?
I'm toying with this idea too. I've read a lo
On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 03:22:02PM -0500, Paul Lussier wrote:
> mike ledoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Most likely, my replacement for this TiVo will be a nice MythTV box
> > with a couple of HD tuners, but I probably won't bother until SD
> > broadcasts become unavailable.
>
> Do you mean
-- Original message --
From: Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> mike ledoux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Most likely, my replacement for this TiVo will be a nice MythTV box
> > with a couple of HD tuners, but I probably won't bother until SD
> > broadcasts be
I recently looked into creating a MythTV box for HD,
> but unfortunately, there are no cable-ready receiver cards,
> so all you can do is receive and record OTA (over the air)
> HD broadcasts, so if you wanted to record say a Discovery
> HD program, you are SOL. When WinTV or Hauppage etc co
> I recently looked into creating a MythTV box for HD, but unfortunately,
there are no cable-ready receiver cards, so all you can do is receive
and record OTA (over the air) HD broadcasts, so if you wanted to record
say a Discovery HD program, you are SOL. When WinTV or Hauppage etc
come out with
Why wouldn't this work?
http://www.pchdtv.com/hd_3000.html
Does that only tune OTA broadcasts?
Correct, that is only OTA broadcasts.
The problem is that HD on any cable or sat system is scrambled, so you
would need to descramble the channel in order to record it. You can't do
that with the c
On 12/13/05, John Abreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Without the network card, I don't know how I'd be able to use thetivoweb server on my S1 tivo.Sometimes I wish I could do this with my S2 TiVoTravis Roy wrote:> Right, I don't really see the point of any kind of connection for a S1
> DTiVo.. It's
-- Original message --
From: Travis Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >
> > I recently looked into creating a MythTV box for HD,
> > make my own PVR.
>
> MythTV has support for recording from, and controlling cable boxes, via
> Firewire, including HD.
>
> This is
On Dec 13, 2005, at 16:51, Travis Roy wrote:
The problem is that HD on any cable or sat system is scrambled, so you
would need to descramble the channel in order to record it. You can't
do that with the cards out on the market.
I took a look once at doing this for my Dish Network service (the
On 12/13/05, Jeff Kinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Isn't there an intermediate format known as "SD" which is a digital
> broadcast that has the same resolution as an analog broadcast?
The TV broadcast system the US has been using for decades is NTSC,
which is a fairly ancient, analog standard.
On 12/13/05, Star <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My company is primarily a windows shop.
Keep in mind that forcing nix down the throats of doze people rarely
turns out well, and sometimes harms the reputation of nix. And as far
as performance goes, cost of administration almost always far exceeds
On 12/13/05, Tom Buskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/13/05, John Abreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Without the network card, I don't know how I'd be able to use the
> > tivoweb server on my S1 tivo.
>
> Sometimes I wish I could do this with my S2 TiVo
I got a question on this. I've se
On 12/13/05, Mark Komarinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tivo2Go is really nice too. Along with the HME apps like Galleon.
>
> Now if only I could get it to find my SlimServer...
>
ditto
I'm working on a side project at home - I call it TiVoCast. The
general idea is to marry Buffalo's LinkS
I got a question on this. I've seen claims that Series 2 TiVo's
cannot be "hacked" to modify/add software. I've also seen claims that
they can, if you use a PC to gain access to the hard disks first and
insert a suitable back door. Anyone have any trustworthy information
on the subject? Mo
> Is the real issue managing BIND, or is the real issue that
> everybody
> there hates nix, and BIND management is just the latest
> excuse to get
> rid of nix?Currently, it's some of each. There is
definately a fear of using something that's not understood. It's
not so much a matter of trying to
If you've already got BIND servers that work and you're just looking for a way
to administer it with a pretty interface, rather than editing BIND
configuration files, check out ProBIND. I recently set that up at a Windows
show that already had BIND/Linux servers that most of the staff hated to
On Dec 13, 2005, at 18:26, Star wrote:
don't get me going on the webmin
conversation
Well, now you've piqued my interest - webmin sounds tailor-made for the
problem at hand - you could land them in a screen that would only let
them configure Bind.
There's also this windows GUI version of B
28 matches
Mail list logo