Personally, in that range? I turn the heating fan off in
my car. *Wham* Interferiance is GONE and I can listen to my
NHPR. ;-)On 2/16/06, Michael ODonnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Something near our house has recently startedgenerating spectacular amounts of radio intereferencethat's most n
On Thursday 16 February 2006 09:09 pm, Michael ODonnell wrote:
> Something near our house has recently started
> generating spectacular amounts of radio intereference
> that's most noticeable around 89MHz. I have no
> portable radio equipment of any kind except a humble
> little $10 handheld with
If I were still up in the GNH area, I'd offer to come over and help youout. But, I suspect your best bet would be to find a local amateur("ham") radio club and see if they have some folks who could help youtriangulate the source. It can get into a real can of worms - twootherwise innocent stations
Neil Joseph Schelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My boss just came to me with a failed hard drive in a personal computer of
> his. I'm remembering only that someone mentioned having some experience with
> hard disc recovery services recently, but I can't seem to find it in my list
> history.
Something near our house has recently started
generating spectacular amounts of radio intereference
that's most noticeable around 89MHz. I have no
portable radio equipment of any kind except a humble
little $10 handheld with a normal telescoping antenna
that seems not to be very directional, or a
Does this get posted?
I have been trying to send the merrilug meeting notice to
gnhlug-discuss all day. I never get through. This is to check if a
spam filter is snagging it.
Jim Kuzdrall
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlu
On 2/16/06, Seth Cohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Cain and Abel is a sniffer program, plain and simple... it took _six_ months
> for
> them to look for weird traffic???)
Well, the article doesn't give enough detail to really know what
happened, how, or anything. A simple passive sniffer won'
My cow-orker (from the Windows side of the company
and maybe transitioning to Linux) thanks y'all for the
feedback and is impressed with the GNHLUG. Same here.
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mail
On Thursday 16 February 2006 02:14 pm, Ed Lawson wrote:
> Well, this is a password sniffer that has been around for five
> years and no doubt has been in anti-virus software for nearly as
> long yet they were running a windows box without running
> anti-virus software and it was a server containing
> > HB1197 is now up for a reconsideration vote, since the study
> committee
> > would seek to know how and why this sort of thing happened,
and
> how/if
> > open source could have prevented it.
I suppose one could argue that if the production machines
required less TLC, the the sys admin folks
On Feb 16, 2006, at 13:36, Bruce Dawson wrote:
Anyways, why is the Executive Committee getting involved in legislative
actions? Or, why didn't someone clue the legislaturers that less than
1%
of the state's computers are mainframes?
Ah, I was similarly confused. There is an Executive Commi
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:47:46 -0500
Seth Cohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Late breaking news...
> HB1197 is now up for a reconsideration vote, since the study
committee
> would seek to know how and why this sort of thing happened, and
how/if
> open source could have prevented it. (Cain and Abel
Late breaking news...
Thanks to front page headlines on the computer hack...
http://unionleader.com/article.aspx?articleId=de7276ec-e725-42e4-aa26-123b8d304b36
Choice quote: The program may have lain hidden for as long as six
months — the last time computer experts ran a thorough check of the
sta
Well, maybe we can get someone to sponsor a bill that *mandates* Open
Source be used. That should get the Executive Committee to stand up and
notice that the state has investments in things other than mainframes!
Anyways, why is the Executive Committee getting involved in legislative
actions? Or,
On Thursday, Feb 16th 2006 at 12:54 -0500, quoth Paul Lussier:
=>Is there a requirement to place parens around a set of commands
=>delimeted by a ';' for crontab entries?
=>
=>At some point I got in the habit of creating entries like:
=>
=>30 02 * * * (foo;bar;baz)
=>
=>But nowhere can I find docu
Paul Lussier wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a requirement to place parens around a set of commands
delimeted by a ';' for crontab entries?
At some point I got in the habit of creating entries like:
30 02 * * * (foo;bar;baz)
But nowhere can I find documentation even mentioning the use of
parens. Of c
Hi all,
Is there a requirement to place parens around a set of commands
delimeted by a ';' for crontab entries?
At some point I got in the habit of creating entries like:
30 02 * * * (foo;bar;baz)
But nowhere can I find documentation even mentioning the use of
parens. Of course, I haven't even
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:57:02 -0500
Jeff Kinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My guess is that the resident technology people have no
> experience with or interest in Open Source.
I trust people know that the main website for the state of NH has
historically run on Linux using Apache?
There are ma
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 10:22:01AM -0500, Fred wrote:
>
> I would have to somewhat disagree with this. Whenever a group of nodes
> interact in concert, that entire group can be considered a node in its own
> right, with its own peculiar set of dynamics. It does not matter whether
> the "nodes"
Fred wrote:
So, to differ, "organizations" DO exist -- but their efficiency to
act is inversely proportional to the number of participants. That is
to say, the "collective IQ" of the group, if there is such a thing,
will always be *less* than the IQ of individuals. The reason for this
is si
On Feb 16, 2006, at 06:20, Seth Cohn wrote:
Anyone interested in helping this effort, please contact me, as we can
start laying the ground work for next year...
Hi, Seth,
This list is probably the right place for that. We are, after all the
folks in NH interested in working together
Ah, finally got Kontact (Kmail) to not crash on me. Too many email accounts
for it, I think.
On Wednesday 15 February 2006 12:16, Ben Scott wrote:
...
> Group's are neither clueless nor clueful. People are. Groups do
> not do things; individuals do. A group may contain many clueful
> people
D'oh. Sent this to Ben only. Silly gmail.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Lawrence Tilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Feb 16, 2006 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: xine Problem
To: Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for the extra tips, Ben. I have seen some complaints about
kernal patches ki
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 06:20:20AM -0500, Seth Cohn wrote:
> HB1197 was voted ITL (Inexpedient to Legislate) yesterday by the NH
> House. This was no surprise, as the Executive Dept committee voted to
> kill it by 15 to 1, and released the following report on it:
>
> HB 1197, establishing a commi
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 06:20:20 -0500
Seth Cohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Upon checking with the Office of
> Information Technology, it was determined that the state does
not have
> the technical resources to control or support such software.
I believe there are some things that should be done
HB1197 was voted ITL (Inexpedient to Legislate) yesterday by the NH
House. This was no surprise, as the Executive Dept committee voted to
kill it by 15 to 1, and released the following report on it:
HB 1197, establishing a committee to study requiring state government
to consider using open sourc
26 matches
Mail list logo
