It has been pointed out that GNHLUG turned 12 today. The first ever
GNHLUG meeting took place on this day (19 Oct) in 1994, in Nashua:
http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Www/FirstAnnouncement
Happy birthday, GNHLUG. To everyone who has contributed in the
past, or does so today: Thank you
On 10/19/06, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Where are these battles you speak of? Who's fighting? You seem to
think there's something to win or lose here.
"We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you have missed the
point." -- Unknown
-- Ben
Greetings,
I've agreed to do a talk about VMWare for the MerriLUG November meeting.
I've got a decent amount of experience from using it at work for the last
few months and it seems to be something people have interest in (or at
least virtualization in general).
The comments I'm requesting are fo
brk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Right, in subsections of the market linux owns a healthy chunk. In
> others it is a rounding error.
>
> In the O/S market overall, linux is still a minority and not making
> any significant in-roads. There are several groups/projects pushing
> the linux desktop
brk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The linux community is made up of militias, when what it needs is an army.
This assumes that those of us choosing to use Linux care what others
use and feel it our mission to attempt to "convert the great unwashed".
Whereas in reality, many of who use do so
bec
I currently use a Linux box running Clark Connect to run my network,
this box supply's a modified Linksys wrt54g to provide my wireless services
that said most of my devices run on the wireless, the wrt54g pulls dhcp
provided by the Linux box, I am unaware of what software
Clark connect uses to
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 07:26:55AM -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
> On 10/16/06, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hello, world!
>
> I'm a bit surprised we haven't heard from any Postfix or qmail fans
> in this thread. Perfect holy war folder here, people, come on. :)
Choices are fun, and not j
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:42:44PM -0400, mike ledoux wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:16:05PM -0400, Travis Roy wrote:
> > >Since I suggested it I should probably explain why I suggested this
> > >change. It's very simple... I perfer that mailing lists have the name of
> > >the list in the sub
I'm now using postfix + blacklists + spamassassin in daemon mode for
server side filtering. I've found that the blacklists are moderately
effective, the strict verification rules you can put into postfix are very
effective, and spamassassin out of the box is not that effective.
On the client side
Just a test
--
Travis Roy
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Since the good ole gub'mint is involved, I've got money on having to do this
> at least twice :)
Unfortunately the ROM in my Casio watch will be harder to update.
md
--
Jon "maddog" Hall
Executive Director Linux International(R)
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PySIG -- New Hampshire Python Special Interest Group
Amoskeag Business Incubator, Manchester, NH
26 October 2006 (4th Thursday) 7:00PM
Python Development Tools -- meld, SciTE, Subversion
Lambda expressions
The monthly meeting of PySIG, the New Hampshire Python Special Interest
Group, happens on
On Oct 19, 2006, at 10:00 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
On 10/19/06, brk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This whole discussion has shown why linux has such a hard time
winning serious market-share.
My understanding is that Linux has won "serious market-share" in the
server/infrastructure area, but has had
On Oct 19, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Ben Scott wrote:
On 10/19/06, brk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just pick an MTA and be done with it, as long as the list mail gets
through 95% of the subscriber base probably doesn't care.
The topic for this list is Linux and related software.
I never said it wa
On 10/18/06, Michael ODonnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wish there was some sort of standard for email messages that
provided for a special section (maybe near the beginning?)
reserved for information about the message itself, like the
date, the destination address, the sender's address, etc.
On 10/19/06, Tom Buskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Blame it on FDR. It was a wartime thing to get more daylight working hours
into the factories.
I'm not expert on history, but I do believe artificial lighting
existing in the 1940's.
I might also point out that one does not need to change t
On 10/19/06, brk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just pick an MTA and be done with it, as long as the list mail gets
through 95% of the subscriber base probably doesn't care.
The topic for this list is Linux and related software. That would
include MTAs. There's lots of people here with experienc
On 10/19/06, brk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This whole discussion has shown why linux has such a hard time
winning serious market-share.
My understanding is that Linux has won "serious market-share" in the
server/infrastructure area, but has had relatively limited adoption
"on the desktop". F
On 10/18/2006 10:43 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
> It's easy for most computer systems, but what about (e.g.) a
> photocopier or a phone system with fixed firmware that cannot be
> updated? Both are real examples from where I work. Now I'm going to
> have to manually change the time twice a year.
>
> T
On 10/18/06, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
And don't give me any bullshit about farmers. Farmers get up when theanimals do, and always have. It's been a political thing from dayone. It's easier to dick with the clocks then it is to solve realproblems.
Blame it on FDR. It was a wartime t
This whole discussion has shown why linux has such a hard time
winning serious market-share.
The linux community is made up of militias, when what it needs is an
army. People are arguing over subject-line formatting and MTA's for
a mailing list that is lucky to get a half-dozen messages
"Ben Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/16/06, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello, world!
>
> I'm a bit surprised we haven't heard from any Postfix or qmail fans
> in this thread. Perfect holy war folder here, people, come on. :)
I've never used Exim, but don't see any reas
"Ben Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/18/06, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Dealing with consoles, xterms, and Xauthority
>> are highly encouraged, but not required.
>
> You should get X resources in there, too.
Well, if an implementor chose to be X compliant, one of the c
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 07:26 -0400, Ben Scott wrote:
> On 10/16/06, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello, world!
>
> I'm a bit surprised we haven't heard from any Postfix or qmail fans
> in this thread. Perfect holy war folder here, people, come on. :)
>
> Ha ha, only serious. I'v
On Thursday 19 October 2006 12:30 am, Ben Scott wrote:
> In the meantime, is http://www.exim.org/ the best place to go to
> learn about Exim?
I've been quiet in this conversation so far, but I figured now is a good time
to pipe up my Exim support as well. I've been a fan for some time and got
On 10/16/06, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, world!
I'm a bit surprised we haven't heard from any Postfix or qmail fans
in this thread. Perfect holy war folder here, people, come on. :)
Ha ha, only serious. I've got someone that's got my half-way
convinced that Exim is better
26 matches
Mail list logo
