On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 03:39:36PM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> Brian sent me what the sync rates are supposed to be, but I'm not sure
> what I'm doing. The manual calls for 1440x900 in either DVI mode or not
> (whatever that is). The connector from my puter is the plain old video
> connector w
On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 05:26:02PM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> Lots of good stuff going on. Nothing is working exactly the way I'd like
> it to. The closest I've gotten is
>
> http://steveo.syslang.net/XF86Config-4
>
> which gives me a display of the desired 1440x900 but is for some
> mysteri
On Tuesday, Jan 2nd 2007 at 16:04 -0500, quoth Michael ODonnell:
=>
=>
=>>http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-203905.html
=>
=>I wish *I'd* said that... ;->
Lots of good stuff going on. Nothing is working exactly the way I'd like
it to. The closest I've gotten is
http://steveo
>http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-203905.html
I wish *I'd* said that... ;->
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
I turned off the DDC options for both the video card and display,
hard-coded
the timings (which I found online), and used 915resolution, which is
necessary to get some common Intel cards to support resolutions other than
your typical ones. Some combination of these tactics will likely work for
y
On Tuesday, Jan 2nd 2007 at 14:44 -0500, quoth Thomas Charron:
=>On 1/2/07, Drew Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
=>>
=>> You need a *modeline* for 1440x900, not just a mention of it in the
=>> Display subsection.
=>>
=>> Random googled modeline (put with the rest of the modelines.
=>> *** U
On Tuesday 02 January 2007 02:17 pm, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> I'm running an old copy of debian sarge. I came in this morning and found
> that someone had taken my old lcd monitor and replaced it with a different
> one that was wider. The new monitor runs at 1440x900 native and I was
> running at 128
On 1/2/07, Drew Van Zandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You need a *modeline* for 1440x900, not just a mention of it in the
Display subsection.
Random googled modeline (put with the rest of the modelines.
*** Use at your own risk, YMMV, do not eat, may incur the wrath of the
elder gods, do not dis
On 1/2/07, Steven W. Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
SubSection "Display"
Depth 24
Modes "1440x1440" "1280x1024"
EndSubSection
Does anyone have any clue where to start with this beast?
Is it safe to assume 1440x1440 is a
You need a *modeline* for 1440x900, not just a mention of it in the
Display subsection.
Random googled modeline (put with the rest of the modelines.
*** Use at your own risk, YMMV, do not eat, may incur the wrath of the
elder gods, do not dispose of in fire or damnation, IANAL but my
sister is. *
People discussing (what appears to be) the same problem:
http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-203905.html
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
I'm running an old copy of debian sarge. I came in this morning and found
that someone had taken my old lcd monitor and replaced it with a different
one that was wider. The new monitor runs at 1440x900 native and I was
running at 1280x1024. Here's the catch: The specs for the new monitor does
n
On Dec 29, 2006, at 1:50 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
Maybe. They plan to start gawd-awfully early... It's likely the 6
Am out of Concord (would you prefer the 6 Am out of Manchester?),
7:45 South Station, red line to Park St. to green "B" line for 8:30
registration...
Or I may sleep on the floor
13 matches
Mail list logo
