Re: Desperate for deb docs

2007-10-16 Thread Paul Lussier
"Ben Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> How does one re-build a .deb package? > > You grab the source package, untar it. You grab the patch file and > apply it. You run the build tools. Err, how about: $ apt-get source foo $ dpkg-buildpackage -r fakeroot > I expect, with the success

Re: [OT] Old Roomba for anyone to play with

2007-10-16 Thread Dan Jenkins
On 10/16/07, Dan Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A friend of mine has an old Roomba to give away to anyone who wants to > play with it. The battery is old, but the rest works, as far as he can > tell. He was hoping there was some one with a tech bent who might like > it, before he trashes it.

[OT] Old Roomba for anyone to play with

2007-10-16 Thread Dan Jenkins
A friend of mine has an old Roomba to give away to anyone who wants to play with it. The battery is old, but the rest works, as far as he can tell. He was hoping there was some one with a tech bent who might like it, before he trashes it. -- Dan Jenkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Rastech Inc., Bedfor

Re: Desperate for deb docs

2007-10-16 Thread Ben Scott
On 10/16/07, Tyson Sawyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where is the equivalent of srpm packages? Last I looked: There isn't anything properly like an SRPM. Debian source packages consist of the original, unmodified, upstream.tar.gz source kit package, along with a single giant patch (diff) file

Re: Desperate for deb docs

2007-10-16 Thread Steven W. Orr
On Tuesday, Oct 16th 2007 at 15:58 -, quoth Steven W. Orr: =>I have looked. And I mean really looked. I need help. => =>I need docs on how to build .deb files. I do not want docs on how to build =>.deb files for a debian distribution. I do not want docs on debian policy. =>I need to understa

Re: Desperate for deb docs

2007-10-16 Thread Star
As I recall (it's been a bit) if you're on a deb-like system it's $ apt-get source foo-package Then you can alter, rebuild, and make a deb from that. It will be deployed in the current directory as ./foo-package-version/ That also assumes that your /etc/apt/sources.list file contain the correct

Re: Desperate for deb docs

2007-10-16 Thread Tyson Sawyer
OK, that was helpful. But there is still a big picture thing that I don't understand: How does one re-build a .deb package? Where is the equivalent of srpm packages? What if I want to rebuild a package on a different architecture or with some minor change? Thanks! Ty On 10/16/07, Star <[EMAIL

Re: Desperate for deb docs

2007-10-16 Thread Thomas Charron
On 10/16/07, Star <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I need docs on how to build .deb files. I do not want docs on how to build > > .deb files for a debian distribution. I do not want docs on debian policy. > > I need to understand the intricasies of how to write control files (e.g., > > control, prein

Re: Desperate for deb docs

2007-10-16 Thread Thomas Charron
On 10/16/07, Steven W. Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have looked. And I mean really looked. I need help. > I need docs on how to build .deb files. I do not want docs on how to build > .deb files for a debian distribution. I do not want docs on debian policy. > I need to understand the intricas

Re: Desperate for deb docs

2007-10-16 Thread Michael ODonnell
On my Debian "unstable" box I can say: man deb ...and it leads me on to a bunch of stuff that looks pretty useful, like: deb deb-control deb-old debtags dpkg dpkg-deb ...etc, etc. IOW, RTFM.>-/ ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-di

Re: Desperate for deb docs

2007-10-16 Thread Star
> I need docs on how to build .deb files. I do not want docs on how to build > .deb files for a debian distribution. I do not want docs on debian policy. > I need to understand the intricasies of how to write control files (e.g., > control, preinst, postinst, prerm, postrm, etc...) I found the IBM

Desperate for deb docs

2007-10-16 Thread Steven W. Orr
I have looked. And I mean really looked. I need help. I need docs on how to build .deb files. I do not want docs on how to build .deb files for a debian distribution. I do not want docs on debian policy. I need to understand the intricasies of how to write control files (e.g., control, preinst,

Re: logwatch, smartd, and a varying parameter (Seek_Time_Performance)

2007-10-16 Thread Ben Scott
On 9/19/07, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Prefailure: Seek_Time_Performance (8) changed to > 252, 253, 252, 251, 252, 251, 252, 253, > > It occurs to me that it would be really nice if logwatch could > maintain a "tolerance" on this parameter, such that these normal > variation

Re: Books are dead thread: Bookpool features APress @ 50%

2007-10-16 Thread David J Berube
In Soviet Russia, Bookpool confirms NETCRAFT is dead! Take it easy, David Berube Berube Consulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] (603)-485-9622 http://www.berubeconsulting.com/ Ben Scott wrote: > On 10/16/07, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm sorry if I made it sound so dire that I've launched "Bo

Re: Books are dead thread: Bookpool features APress @ 50%

2007-10-16 Thread Ben Scott
On 10/16/07, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm sorry if I made it sound so dire that I've launched "Bookpool is > dead" rumors. Bookpool is dead. Netcraft confirms it. /sorry, I forgot this isn't Slashdot //sorry, I forgot this isn't Fark, either __

Re: Books are dead thread: Bookpool features APress @ 50%

2007-10-16 Thread Scott Garman
Ted Roche wrote: > It could be desperation, or it could be fall cleaning, but BookPool is > featuring Apress and "Friends of Ed" books at 50% this month, including > the book I'll be pushing in my CSS sessions next month: > > http://www.bookpool.com > > Cascading Style Sheets: Separating Content

[GNHLUG] NHRuby.org Meeting TONIGHT, Oct 16: Rails Deployments & More

2007-10-16 Thread Scott Garman
Tonight's NHRuby.org meeting topic will be on deploying Ruby on Rails applications. While back in May our meeting focus was on using Capistrano as our primary deployment tool, this month Scott Garman will be demonstrating a simpler application to manage Rails deployments, called "Vlad the Deployer"

Re: Books are dead thread: Bookpool features APress @ 50%

2007-10-16 Thread Ted Roche
David J Berube wrote: > FWIW, word from Apress is that it's a promotion, not a > Bookpool-is-going-under sale. Banners and all that on Apress.com and > elswehere. I'm sorry if I made it sound so dire that I've launched "Bookpool is dead" rumors. That wasn't my intent. The trade book industry is a

Re: Books are dead thread: Bookpool features APress @ 50%

2007-10-16 Thread Kent Johnson
Ted Roche wrote: > It could be desperation, or it could be fall cleaning, or even routine marketing...Bookpool regularly has sales on specific publishers, a couple of months ago it was Addison-Wesley and PH. But hey, why pick an ordinary explanation when there is a sensational one to be had :-

Books are dead thread: Bookpool features APress @ 50%

2007-10-16 Thread Ted Roche
It could be desperation, or it could be fall cleaning, but BookPool is featuring Apress and "Friends of Ed" books at 50% this month, including the book I'll be pushing in my CSS sessions next month: http://www.bookpool.com Cascading Style Sheets: Separating Content from Presentation http://www.b

[GNHLUG] CentraLUG, November 5th: Ted Roche, Cascading Style Sheets

2007-10-16 Thread Ted Roche
The monthly meeting of CentraLUG, the Concord/Central NH GNHLUG chapter, happens the first Monday of most months at the New Hampshire Technical Institute's Library, room 146, at 7 PM. Next month's meeting is on November 5th at 7 PM. Directions and maps are available at http://www.centralug.org Open