On Jan 23, 2008, at 22:05, Ben Scott wrote:
> Perhaps not. From what I've read, there is a standard way to
> connect multiple logical devices in a single SATA cable. This
> facilitates a device called a "SATA port multiplier". You have run a
> single (e)SATA cable from the host adapter to the
On Jan 23, 2008 6:07 PM, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've also heard of multiport(path?) where 1 SATA port goes to 4-5 devices.
>
> Yeah, like Jarod said, this is just 4x4 (e.)SATA.
Perhaps not. From what I've read, there is a standard way to
connect multiple logical devices in
On Jan 23, 2008, at 08:42, Tom Buskey wrote:
> I've also heard of multiport(path?) where 1 SATA port goes to 4-5
> devices.
> Does Linux have device drivers for it? I know Solaris does not and
> MacOSX
> does.
Yeah, like Jarod said, this is just 4x4 (e.)SATA. I think I've seen
a multilan
On Jan 23, 2008, at 08:41, Ben Scott wrote:
> You could configure your SMTP relay to accept any authentication
> attempt (regardless of credentials) from IP addresses on/behind the
> router. Hmmm. Thinking further on it, though, it would have other
> problems. In particular, it breaks SPF, Se
On January 23, 2008, Jarod Wilson sent me the following:
> On Wednesday 23 January 2008 08:42:10 am Tom Buskey wrote:
> > I've also heard of multiport(path?) where 1 SATA port goes to 4-5 devices.
> > Does Linux have device drivers for it? I know Solaris does not and MacOSX
> > does.
>
> Are you
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 08:42:10 am Tom Buskey wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2008 3:47 PM, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's not too bad - I have a 6' e.SATA cable on one of my drives. The
> > connectors are the worst of any technology I've ever seen - has
> > anybody here solved this?
On Jan 22, 2008 5:19 PM, Scott Garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With all this discussion of VMWare, I thought I'd mention that there is
> a fully open source alternative to it that I just discovered. It's
> called VirtualBox:
>
> http://www.virtualbox.org/
>
> I've been using it alongside with
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:19:27 -0500
Scott Garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With all this discussion of VMWare, I thought I'd mention that there is
> a fully open source alternative to it that I just discovered. It's
> called VirtualBox:
>
> http://www.virtualbox.org/
>
> I've been using it a
On Jan 22, 2008 3:47 PM, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's not too bad - I have a 6' e.SATA cable on one of my drives. The
> connectors are the worst of any technology I've ever seen - has
> anybody here solved this? I think the multilink cables are better -
> infiniband connect
On Jan 22, 2008 8:53 PM, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Use IPtables to intercept all
>> TCP/25 traffic and redirect it to your existing SMTP relay server.
>
> I think this will hose up anybody configured to do SMTP AUTH if it
> runs through a 'regular' SMTP relay.
You could config
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Garman wrote:
> With all this discussion of VMWare, I thought I'd mention that there is
> a fully open source alternative to it that I just discovered. It's
> called VirtualBox:
>
> http://www.virtualbox.org/
>
> I've been using it alongside
***
Dartmouth-Lake Sunapee Linux User Group
http://dlslug.org/
a chapter of GNHLUG - http://gnhlug.org
***
The next regular mo
12 matches
Mail list logo
