Have you looked into rsync vs. ftp? I've used rsync in many situations
to move files and it has many great options and handles interrupted
transfers, etc.
You can find it here:
http://samba.anu.edu.au/rsync/
Sincerely,
Andy
KoreLogic Security
603.465.3236 (Office)
603.340.2498 (Mobile)
http://
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Michael Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> X.25? Yikes.
That's what I said. Only more colorful. ;-)
> Didn't my post about Westermo's old-copper ethernet bridge units make it out
> to the list?
I saw it, and even saved note of it. It's rather more of a
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have some emails out to try to get more information.
Cool. Thanks. I've already received a couple more off-list
referrals, so I've got some other feelers out. It may all end up
coming to naught, but I won't know unt
I've been soliciting solutions from everyone I can think of on moving a
large number of files from inside our lan to a dmz on a regular basis.
I have a cluster of machine producing 20k small files (30kbytes or so)
inside our lan. After the files are created, they are pushed to a few
web servers i
***
Dartmouth-Lake Sunapee Linux User Group
http://dlslug.org/
a chapter of GNHLUG - http://gnhlug.org
***
The next regular
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I looked for a link, but didn't see it in the emails from Ken L.
>> Citel box I assume?
> Yah, the Citel Portico TVA. Ken didn't have a direct link
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked for a link, but didn't see it in the emails from Ken L.
> Citel box I assume?
Yah, the Citel Portico TVA. Ken didn't have a direct link, but he
posted a link to an Asterisk page (for other reasons), and that p
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked for a link, but didn't see it in the emails from Ken L.
> Citel box I assume?
I didn't see the link to Citel anywhere, so in case it hasn't been brought up:
http://www.citel.com/Products/Portico.asp
It's co
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Ben, out of curiosity, what phones do you have on the desks now?
>> Meridian sets?
> Pretty much. The Norstar supports a subset of the line of Merid
X.25? Yikes.
Didn't my post about Westermo's old-copper ethernet bridge units make it out
to the list?
http://www.westermo.com/Resource.phx/content/uk/products/ethernet/ethernet-e
xtender/ddw-220.htx
It allows the use of crummy old telco twisted pair to deliver
lower-bandwidth ethernet up to 10
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:14 AM, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It matters because your only interface available to the Norstar system is
> evidently POTS.
Ah, I see what you're getting at, now.
FWIW, PRI T1/ISDN line cards are available for the Norstar, but I'd
prefer not to go
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Thomas Charron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben, out of curiosity, what phones do you have on the desks now?
> Meridian sets?
Pretty much. The Norstar supports a subset of the line of Meridian
proprietary digital sets. We've got at least one of most of them.
(M
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:33 AM, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If you had an "ordinary" analog telephone with "speed dial"
>> buttons capable of sending DTMF during a call, Asterisk could
>> detect and act on them without requiring any hookflashing.
> Which would suck ass for any number o
> If you had an "ordinary" analog telephone with "speed dial"
> buttons capable of sending DTMF during a call, Asterisk could
> detect and act on them without requiring any hookflashing.
Which would suck ass for any number of reasons. Response would be
slow, users would hear the touch tones, it
14 matches
Mail list logo
