>should be dismembered.
Well, before you dismember them, have you actually ever written to them
and told them?
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Contact%20us
I have written to Sourceforge twice, once to ask about site statistics
(i.e. number of projects, number of developers) tha
Benjamin Scott writes:
> Firefox 3.6.4, currently in the late stages of beta, implements
> out-of-process plugins (OOPP). So when Flash explodes, locks up, goes
> into an endless loop, etc., you can just kill off that one process,
> and the browser is left intact. I've been running it since i
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Dan Jenkins wrote:
>> We don't have to wear spandex, do we??
>> I, for one, definitely do not look good in spandex.
>> But a cape might be cool.
>
> No capes! Thunderhead, Stratogale, the list goes on...
Jeffry Smith writes:
>
> One option would be to try FF with user-agent-switcher. I've logged
> into many sites with FF that claim to require IE, but when I use UAS
> to set FF to claim to be IE, they work fine.
My favourite suggestion, which I saw somewhere a few weeks ago,
is to try setting you
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gerry Hull wrote:
> This is why I LOVE this list -- lots of great feedback.
> I'll go w/64-bit (trying it w/the live-CD first), and probably Virtualbox.
> BTW, I bought the X61 for $250, in mint condition, from Craigslist. Pretty
> good deal for a decent dual-core
On 06/16/2010 09:11 AM, Tom Buskey wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Gerry Hull wrote:
>
>> This is why I LOVE this list -- lots of great feedback.
>> I'll go w/64-bit (trying it w/the live-CD first), and probably Virtualbox.
>> BTW, I bought the X61 for $250, in mint condition, from Cr
> Processes can potentially indirectly access more than 4 GiB of RAM
> by using memory windowing/bank swapping/etc. This would be similar
> to "Expanded Memory" from the days of the 8086. Reserve some
> range of process-addressable memory. A special library/system
> call exchanges that block o
I haven't gotten wireless to work yet but I haven't spent time on it beyond
trying the default Ubuntu stuff.
>If you have a Broadcom chip, just install /b43/-/fwcutter/ from the
>Ubuntu repos. During installation it pops up a dialog whether you want
>to download the firmware or not. Just click ye
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Michael ODonnell
wrote:
>> Processes can potentially indirectly access more than 4 GiB of RAM
>> by using memory windowing/bank swapping/etc. This would be similar
>> to "Expanded Memory" from the days of the 8086. Reserve some
>> range of process-addressable mem
On 06/16/2010 09:20 AM, Michael ODonnell wrote:
> Well, when you've got an installed base of venerable yet cantankerous
> 32bit apps that are tuned for that 4Gb virtual space and need to
> interoperate with a bunch of 3rd party apps and libs and drivers that are
> also 32bit and it would be a bitch
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 10:28:01 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> On 06/16/2010 09:20 AM, Michael ODonnell wrote:
>> Well, when you've got an installed base of venerable yet cantankerous
>> 32bit apps that are tuned for that 4Gb virtual space and need to
>> interoperate with a bunch of 3rd party apps
> 32-bit apps run fine in a 64-bit Linux OS, and in many cases better
> since the OS can manage memory a bit more efficiently. The downside
> is that you need to install the required 32-bit libraries too.
> So far, I have not seen a 32-bit application that could not run on
> a 64-bit Linux OS.
12 matches
Mail list logo
