I've actually been impressed at how stable and featured it is, in the
limited window where I have interacted with it. I ported a C# app which
needed to use a specific .net DLL library to ironpython on mono, and it
went smoothly with no platform issues. I used standard text editors and
occasionally
I suppose I am confused why your VPS provider would charge 10$ more for
openvpn access.
If it is a real VPS, just run openvpn yourself in UDP mode, on a
non-standard port if you have to. If you're not allowed to do that, it's
not much of a VPS!
___
Just to round out the thread..
As people have already stated, the intel VT optimizations are not required
to support virtualization, or even hypervisors. Vmware ESX is an example
of a decent hypervisor that does not require these CPU capabilities to be
present. KVM on the other hand requires
That's a good clarification. I thought it was important to stress that
there are well-performing 32bit x86 guest virtualization hypervisors out
there that do not require intel VT or AMD-V, such as VMware's ESX 3.5,
ESXi 3.5, workstation products, and current versions of Sun's Virtualbox.
For
With that much performance difference, it's unlikely the filesystem is
responsible.
You might try making a single LUN available with one of the disks (not the
96 disk RAID) as a reference point and run raw bandwidth tests again. HBA
Drivers, switch configuration, and fiber cables are normally
You may wish to consider not using a window manager at all. You may be
able to do everything you need on an ssh console. Or if you must run
something graphical, you may be able to use X11 forwarding over SSH back
to your normal desktop.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to get vnc-server
, is there a way to set
the NIC's back to their normal mode. Are the setting for ethtool
persistent?
# ethtool -s ethX autoneg on ?
Anything else?
-Bruce
Darrell Michaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/06/2008 01:45:09 PM:
I'm sure there's other advice out there but I'll throw in:
Don't
I'm sure there's other advice out there but I'll throw in:
Don't change the linux broadcom or intel gig-E ethernet drivers from their
defaults without a specifically documented reason. They will autonegotiate
to 1000 when possible under normal circumstances.
Check your wiring, your switch, your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I first used my
browser in linux, it challenged me. I provided the correct credentials
and was able to access the net.
As others have said a clean fix is to configure your services like yum and
ftp (use a graphical client for easiest configuration) to use
Bruce Labitt wrote:
Ubuntu uses a different package manager, does it really matter?
My feeling is that too much is made of this. I use RPM based distributions
and DEB based distributions interchangeably during the day. From a high
level user's perspective there is no real difference. There's
Bruce Labitt wrote:
Seriously, now. Why Ubuntu vs straight Debian? Ubuntu has worked at
making the average-user experience easier, is that it?
I seem to recall you were unsatisfied with a RHEL derived distribution
because of the slower release cycle and difficulty accessing late-breaking
Fedora is very much a bleeding edge distribution. It usually has the most
late-breaking versions of packages. It is not unheard of to find
pre-release or beta versions, sometimes against the original upstream
source's wishes. It also tends to be a showcase of ideas
I've had excellent luck installing new versions of python alongside
whatever comes with the distribution. This insures nothing in the
distribution breaks, while giving you as a developer access to late
breaking features.
Redhat-esque distributions have a pattern of renaming the python
executable
There also might be a tiny possibility that the infrastructure switches
are filtering or otherwise interfering with the broadcast ping.
It might we worth testing with with a single dumb switch, or even a
crossover cable.
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
Using rsync or unisom or any of the improvements on top of rsync as a
direct replacement for FTP would be a low-hanging fruit improvement.
Tunneling it over an encrypted layer such as SSH improves security as
well.
You're absolutely right that if you have a cluster of machines in the DMZ,
a more
Is there something that you're looking for that hasn't been packaged yet
in a mainstream distribution? It saves a lot of time if you can just
upgrade your distribution's binary packages instead of custom compiling.
If you must compile a custom version, use your distribution's source
packages and
Star said:
...
My question here is this: What are users here using if they shy away
from all of the main-stream (can that be said with Linux yet?)
desktops and go for that One Off style
...
It's still probably too mainstream compared to fvwm, but I just want
something simple with a low,
Shawn K. O'Shea said:
The comments I'm requesting are for exactly what things people about
VMWare and/or virtualization that people would like to here about so I can
tailor the talk.
It may not be technical enough for the audience, but IMHO the killer
feature of the free VMware solutions
I'm now using postfix + blacklists + spamassassin in daemon mode for
server side filtering. I've found that the blacklists are moderately
effective, the strict verification rules you can put into postfix are very
effective, and spamassassin out of the box is not that effective.
On the client side
I'm doing this on two laptops..
One is running Fedora Core 5 x76-64, and occasionally hosts 32bit
WinXP-pro VMs using VMware's free beta server. It works well, and has good
network options, albeit with some command-line configuration.
The other is running WinXP-pro 32bit, and uses Microsoft's
I think that the bootable flag is used to help the BIOS guess where to
look for boot code if it's not in the MBR. If you put a boot loader on the
MBR, you can ignore this flag.
Paul Lussier said:
Mark Komarinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't think it matters, not if you have LILO or GRUB
21 matches
Mail list logo