Re: [OT] Locating source of FM radio interference

2006-02-20 Thread Fred
On Friday 17 February 2006 22:01, Bill Ricker wrote: .. > [ I heard of someone wrapping himself in aluminum foil to do advanced > body shield, but the cops questioned him quite a while (post 9/11, > alas). Not a recommended variation. ] In the "old days" your neighbor would assume you were a alien

Re: [OT] Locating source of FM radio interference

2006-02-17 Thread Bill Ricker
> >It's called "Body Shielding". Your body can act as a shield. Tune the Yes. Advanced body shielding involves a secondary conductive shielf. You put the radio in Pringles can, or other deep open-top conductive case, antenna up, and using a lanyard (string) to pull up (and let gravity pull down

Re: [OT] Locating source of FM radio interference

2006-02-17 Thread Michael ODonnell
>There is a technique that works without going to RadShack or the local >supermarket for parts... Though, as has been pointed out, it works >better for AM than FM... but it should work in FM. > >It's called "Body Shielding". Your body can act as a shield. Tune the Beauty! I suspected that

Re: [OT] Locating source of FM radio interference

2006-02-17 Thread Brian Chabot
Bill Freeman wrote: > In either case, however, a strong enough (interfering) signal >will give no audible change in response over a fairly broad range of >signal strengths (unless it has an "S meter"). For work close to the >source, then, you need a means of seriously attenuating the signal

Re: [OT] Locating source of FM radio interference

2006-02-17 Thread Andrew W. Gaunt
A google search for 89MHz reveals below. Gotta wonder if a fellow geek in the area is hacking a linux box and leaving running in the open air (no case). :-\ Can you record the audio and make a wav file? Someone on this list might be able recognize the 'noise' and narrow the search for its potent

[OT] Locating source of FM radio interference

2006-02-17 Thread Bill Freeman
Michael ODonnell writes: > > Something near our house has recently started > generating spectacular amounts of radio intereference > that's most noticeable around 89MHz. I have no > portable radio equipment of any kind except a humble > little $10 handheld with a normal telescoping antenna

Re: [OT] Locating source of FM radio interference

2006-02-17 Thread Michael ODonnell
> It's also entirely possible that there is a "pirate" broadcaster - Heh. I'm pretty sure it's not a pirate broadcast station unlesss their demographic studies indicate there's a market segment that's fond of the sound of motor noise or arcs discharging. (And, yes - I realize that the former i

Re: [OT] Locating source of FM radio interference

2006-02-16 Thread Thomas Charron
  Personally, in that range?  I turn the heating fan off in my car.  *Wham*  Interferiance is GONE and I can listen to my NHPR.  ;-)On 2/16/06, Michael ODonnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Something near our house has recently startedgenerating spectacular amounts of radio intereferencethat's most n

Re: [OT] Locating source of FM radio interference

2006-02-16 Thread Jim Kuzdrall
On Thursday 16 February 2006 09:09 pm, Michael ODonnell wrote: > Something near our house has recently started > generating spectacular amounts of radio intereference > that's most noticeable around 89MHz. I have no > portable radio equipment of any kind except a humble > little $10 handheld with

Re: [OT] Locating source of FM radio interference

2006-02-16 Thread Bayard Coolidge
If I were still up in the GNH area, I'd offer to come over and help youout. But, I suspect your best bet would be to find a local amateur("ham") radio club and see if they have some folks who could help youtriangulate the source. It can get into a real can of worms - twootherwise innocent stations

[OT] Locating source of FM radio interference

2006-02-16 Thread Michael ODonnell
Something near our house has recently started generating spectacular amounts of radio intereference that's most noticeable around 89MHz. I have no portable radio equipment of any kind except a humble little $10 handheld with a normal telescoping antenna that seems not to be very directional, or a