On Jun 22, 2007, at 17:16, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> There are a number of software employees on this list that might
> find it
> interesting.
I did, but I see them digging their own graves, so I'm not too
worried. If they go under, smarter businesses will replace them.
It does come around to f
Personally, I found it eye-opening, but was expecting to see it on /.
instead of this list.
There are a number of software employees on this list that might find it
interesting.
I'm not saying it should or should not be on this list. I am thanking
Paul for bringing it to *my* attention; sorry if
Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 10:14:12PM -0400, Paul Lussier wrote:
>>
>> This was sent to the SAGE members list today. I urge you to watch it.
>>
>> >> Offered without comment, except that my politics
>> >> are generally those of 1880:
>> >>
>> >>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 10:14:12PM -0400, Paul Lussier wrote:
>
> This was sent to the SAGE members list today. I urge you to watch it.
>
> >> Offered without comment, except that my politics
> >> are generally those of 1880:
> >>
> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCbFEgFajGU
Since there
