Benjamin Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The real down side of forwarding is that DNS search order breaks
>> (this might be fixed in BIND 9, but was definitely broken with BIND
>> 4.x -- I haven't tried it since then).
>
>This has always worked for me just fine with BIND 8.x. I'm even
>
On 4/19/05, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IIRC, the problem was actually the listing of multiple search lines in
> /etc/resolv.conf. The first search line was referenced, possibly the
> second, but I believe the tertiary was ignored. FWIW, MS had a
> similar problem too. Windows woul
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 4/19/05, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> IIRC, the problem was actually the listing of multiple search lines in
>> /etc/resolv.conf. The first search line was referenced, possibly the
>> second, but I believe the tertiary was ignored. FWIW, M
On 4/19/05, Paul Lussier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > everybody else, Microsoft based their initial IP stack on BSD. I
> > dunno how much of the BSD code survives in current stuff.
>
> Was it BSD? I couldn't remember. They seem to have hosed it up
>
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 05:51:11PM -0400, Tom Buskey wrote:
I wonder if there are any TCP stacks that are not derived from BSD.
(SCO maybe??? ;-)
The Mentat TCP/IP stack (which is STREAMS-focused) is used in a number
of different environments, including HP-UX 11i, and a version is in Sun.
It's a
On Apr 19 at 5:51pm, Tom Buskey wrote:
OBLinux: Linux has a BSD based stack too.
s/has/had/
It was just about totally rewritten by Alan Cox, around 2.0 or 2.2, IIRC.
--
Ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Derek Martin wrote:
You have two options here, too: let your name server do all its own look-ups
of host that aren't yours, or have it forward requests to your ISP's
servers. Both options have advantages.
Recent versions of BIND (8.0 and newer, I think) have an option in
