Ben,
The content of /etc/redhat-release file shows:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 2)
Thank you.
Zhao
Ben Scott wrote:
[CC'ing the list with the OP's permission. Please include the list in
any replies.]
On 1/2/06, Zhao Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you for
[CC'ing the list with the OP's permission. Please include the list in
any replies.]
On 1/2/06, Zhao Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for still paying attention to my partition problem.
Sure thing. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. :)
> 1 What release of Red Hat Enter
What : Open Source Development and Productization
Who : Tim Burke, Director of Fedora Project & Kernel Development at Red Hat
When : Tue, 24 Jan 2006, at 5:00 PM
Where: Walker Auditorium, Robert Frost Hall, SNHU
GNHLUG regulars, please note the time!
GNHLUG, NH IEEE/ACM, and SwANH
On 12/30/05, Zhao Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The whole dual-boot thing has been time-consuming, and I think it's time
> for me to forget it and get some real work done.
I didn't have a chance to reply to this thread until now, but I
can't help but thing that the whole approach of trying
On Friday 30 December 2005 09:42 am, Zhao Peng wrote:
> 1 regular boot up from Knopixx
> 2 bring up konsole
2a xhost +
> 3 su -
> 4 swapoff /dev/hda6
> 5 qtparted&
>
> For step 5, I got a line saying "qtparted: cannot connect to X server"
That will be fixed by step 2a added above.
> So I started
Thank you folks. Now I was able to start qtparted from shell as root.
But, I ran into the following error message:
"Filesystem has incompatible feature enabled"
Same error happened when I used parted. Not surprising, I believe qtparted is sort of GUI version of parted.
I googled and found no goo
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:42:38 -0500
Zhao Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> Below is what I did.
>
> 1 regular boot up from Knopixx
> 2 bring up konsole
> 3 su -
> 4 swapoff /dev/hda6
> 5 qtparted&
>
> For step 5, I got a line saying "qtparted: cann
Hi,
Another thing you could do is to use Knoppix to mount and copy your 3 GB of
data to another partition that you are not going to modify, then simply delete
the partition that you wish to resize and remake it.
md
--
Jon "maddog" Hall
Executive Director Linux International(R)
email: [
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:42:38 -0500, Zhao Peng wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> Below is what I did.
>
> 1 regular boot up from Knopixx
> 2 bring up konsole
> 3 su -
> 4 swapoff /dev/hda6
> 5 qtparted&
>
> For step 5, I got a line saying "qtparted: cannot connect to X ser
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 09:42 -0500, Zhao Peng wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> Thanks for your suggestions.
>
> Below is what I did.
>
> 1 regular boot up from Knopixx
> 2 bring up konsole
On my Knoppix 3.9 I can bring up a root console directly from the
Penguin Icon at the lower left (second icon from lef
On Friday 30 December 2005 09:42 am, Zhao Peng wrote:
> 1 regular boot up from Knopixx
> 2 bring up konsole
2a xhost +
> 3 su -
> 4 swapoff /dev/hda6
> 5 qtparted&
>
> For step 5, I got a line saying "qtparted: cannot connect to X server"
That will be fixed by step 2a added above.
> So I started
Hi Jerry,
Thanks for your suggestions.
Below is what I did.
1 regular boot up from Knopixx
2 bring up konsole
3 su -
4 swapoff /dev/hda6
5 qtparted&
For step 5, I got a line saying "qtparted: cannot connect to X server"
So I started qtparted via "K menu" -> "systems", and tried to resize
hd
ace.
>
> In order to resize the hard drive to give some space to Fedora, I used
> Qtparted on Knoppix live DVD (I don't have Partition Magic).
> Unfortunately it didn't work.
>
> My current RedHat partition is as follows:
>
> hda1 ext3
> hda2 ext3
>
it, and no
unallocated free space.
In order to resize the hard drive to give some space to Fedora, I used
Qtparted on Knoppix live DVD (I don't have Partition Magic).
Unfortunately it didn't work.
My current RedHat partition is as follows:
hda1 ext3
hda2 ext3
hda3 ext3
hda4
Ben Scott wrote:
On 12/28/05, Dan Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Partition Magic (aka PQMagic) does not support ext3 filesystems ...
... PQMagic will no longer be updated, since it was bought out by
Symantec ...
Symantec still sells PartitionMagic as a current produ
On 12/28/05, Dan Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Partition Magic (aka PQMagic) does not support ext3 filesystems ...
> ... PQMagic will no longer be updated, since it was bought out by
> Symantec ...
Symantec still sells PartitionMagic as a current product. I don't
know how often they upda
On Dec 28, 2005, at 2:10 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
-- Ben "LVM LV VG PE, WTF?" Scott
Ben, I know you're likely up on all the LVM TLAs, but for those folks
who'd want to know more, Bill Stearns did a great presentation of LVM
at last month's Dartmouth - Lake Sunapee LUG meeting, and expressed
Fred wrote:
The quick answer to that is *yes*. You can, using GRUB, set up as many
booting OSes as you like.
If you need to install it to an existing drive with no free partitions, then
you'll need to repartition that drive. There are ways of doing this under
Linux, but I would not recommend
On the sub-topic of partitions and dual-booting Red Hat derived Linuxes...
I know recent releases of Fedora Core (FC3 and later, IIRC) default
to using LVM for everything. I expect RHEL is going to go that route
eventually, too (if they haven't already). So, if you're using LVM,
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:27:03 -0500
Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you need to install it to an existing drive with no free partitions, then
> you'll need to repartition that drive. There are ways of doing this under
> Linux, but I would not recommend this approach for a neophyte. "Partiti
On Wednesday 28 December 2005 01:10, Zhao Peng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Right now I'm having Red Hat Enterprise AS installed on my desktop
> computer (which has only one hard drive). I'm wondering if I can also
> put Fedora on it so that I can dual boot from either Red Hat Enterpr
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 01:10:44 -0500
Zhao Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Right now I'm having Red Hat Enterprise AS installed on my desktop
> computer (which has only one hard drive). I'm wondering if I can also
> put Fedora on it so that I can dual boot
Hi,
Right now I'm having Red Hat Enterprise AS installed on my desktop
computer (which has only one hard drive). I'm wondering if I can also
put Fedora on it so that I can dual boot from either Red Hat Enterprise
AS or Fedora.
I know that dual-boot system (Windows and Linux) is qu
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 01:41:18PM -0500, Mark Komarinski wrote:
> I want to test out the FC5 test 1 without trashing my existing
> installation, which leads me to using a virual machine of some sort.
> I'm currently running FC4.
>
> I know of the following:
>
> VMWare 4: Can't find virtual disk
On Dec 12, 2005, at 13:41, Mark Komarinski wrote:
VMWare 4: Can't find virtual disk
I'm not certain about VMWare, but Fedora Core sometimes has trouble
using _real_ disks, especially on Intel motherboards.
For some reason if, at the boot prompt (from boot media), you type:
Mark Komarinski wrote:
I want to test out the FC5 test 1 without trashing my existing
installation, which leads me to using a virual machine of some sort.
I'm currently running FC4.
I know of the following:
VMWare 4: Can't find virtual disk
qemu: Stuck trying to calculate dependencies
Xen: Ne
I want to test out the FC5 test 1 without trashing my existing
installation, which leads me to using a virual machine of some sort.
I'm currently running FC4.
I know of the following:
VMWare 4: Can't find virtual disk
qemu: Stuck trying to calculate dependencies
Xen: Never used it, but it looks
erver 204.127.198.19
nameserver 204.127.202.19
nameserver 216.148.227.79
Eric
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Kinz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "GNHLUG Discussion"
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: connecting fedora, Followup
> Oop, Missed one,
lhost
Host (page is blank)
- Original Message -
From: "Frank DiPrete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tatara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "GNHLUG Discussion"
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: question connecting fedora to comcast
&g
Oop, Missed one, on the line :
HOSTNAME=redline
Instead of "redline" use your PC's Hostname.
--
speech recognition software was used in the composition of this e-mail
Jeff Kinz, Emergent Research, Hudson, MA.
¡Ya no mas!
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:28:11PM -0400, Tatara wrote:
> $ cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
> DEVICE=eth0
> BOOTPROTO=none
> BROADCAST=192.168.1.255
> IPADDR=192.168.1.98
> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> NETWORK=192.168.1.0
> ONBOOT=yes
> USERCTL=no
> PEERDNS=no
> TYPE=Ethernet
Hi Eric,
Y
On Aug 24, 2005, at 22:28, Tatara wrote:
GATEWAY=192.168.1.98
This looks wrong. IIRC, the default Linksys IP address is 192.168.1.1,
which should be your gateway.
Try changing it to 192.168.1.1 and doing
service network restart
and see if that works.
Or, probably even better, set it t
esday, August 24, 2005 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: question connecting fedora to comcast
> On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 22:32 -0400, Tatara wrote:
> > I just upgraded my home pc from Fedora Core 2 to 4, and I still can't
> > connect to the internet, even though I can after booting Windows2000
&g
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 22:32 -0400, Tatara wrote:
> I just upgraded my home pc from Fedora Core 2 to 4, and I still can't
> connect to the internet, even though I can after booting Windows2000
> or Knoppix/Suse Live CDs.
>
> The pc is hard-wired to my Linksys router (wrt54g)
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 11:36:07PM -0400, Bob Bell wrote:
I'm not familiar with xDSL, but I wouldn't expect it to work; it's
RH9^^ xDSL
probably trying to set up PPPoE, which shouldn't what you are using.
I suspect that the proper setting is "Ethe
/sbin/ifconfig -a
2. cat /etc/modules.conf
3. cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
4. cat /proc/modules
Scott
Tatara wrote:
I just upgraded my home pc from Fedora Core 2 to 4, and I still can't
connect to the internet, even though I can after booting Windows2000 or
Knoppix/Suse Live CDs
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:32:20PM -0400, Tatara wrote:
The pc is hard-wired to my Linksys router (wrt54g), then to my Comcast
cable modem.
Reading from my Red Hat Linux 9 Bible, I tried the Internet
Configuration Wizard, with no luck. None of the device types
(ethernet, isdn, modem, token ring
I just upgraded my home pc from Fedora Core 2 to 4,
and I still can't connect to the internet, even though I can after booting
Windows2000 or Knoppix/Suse Live CDs.
The pc is hard-wired to my Linksys router (wrt54g),
then to my Comcast cable modem.
Reading from my Red Hat Linux 9
Thank you Bill for the help!
> rpm -e kernel-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4
> yum -y install kernel-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4
Took 2 tries (1st told me what to include with kernel-2.6.12*). The
system's performance and lose of apps. seem to be greatly improved.
> up2date -i kernel-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4
'up2da
On Aug 19, 2005, at 19:46, Lee A. Newcomb wrote:
Your system is currently running kernel-2.6.11-1.1369_FC4,
but the newest installed kernel is kernel-2.6.12-1.1398_FC4.
Anyone know a way to get Fedora to redo the updates without
having to go through the full install again? Maybe just
Hi all,
I need some help with the Fedora 4 installation and update
process.
I am currently using Fedora 4, but still have msw2000 for some
necessary tools only available for that system. My msw2000 disk
died, a new disk was put in, re-installation completed, and
restore completed. I then got
Hello All
I put together a screamin' box.
Anybody out there get ( fedora 2.6.5-1.358 ) install working with a
highpoint raid card? They have a driver disk for RH9 which works well
for that distrib and source code to compile a module BUT I have compiled
the module on this FC2 box (same k
On Jan 9, 2005, at 3:11 PM, Jeffrey Creem wrote:
It is really nice to just do a
yum update
to get your box updated with (most) of the latest security and other
patches.
http://fedoralegacy.org/
What's even nicer is that you can then just swap in the proper yum.conf
files and upgrade to FC1 then
I am sure most people know about this already but since I just recently
figured it out
I thought it was worth a post.
I have a Redhat 9 box I still run (family pictures, etc) that I really do
not want to take the time to
upgrade to fedora or something new.
The fedora legacy project provides a
I will be once again doing a presentation on the Gnu Image Manipulation
Program (The "it's too good to be true, GIMP version 2"), this time at
the Seacoast Linux User Group chapter of GNHLUG, and this time with a
working install on Fedora Core.
Thanks to PogoLinux, I also have a
On May 20, 2004, at 3:34 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
From: Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 20, 2004 3:20:41 PM EDT
To: GNHLUG Mail Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bittorrent Fedora Core 2 MD5 failures?
Head's up to anyone considering using bittorrent to download FC2. After
t;FAIL" messages for the four disks.
> >
> > Anyone got suggestions for an ISO repair kit? Or am I SOL?
You're not SOL at all. This is what rsync lives for. :-)
Follow the _rsync_ instructions I gave in my 5/18 message
"Subject: Fedora core 2 ISO'
On Thu, 20 May 2004, at 3:34pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Anyone got suggestions for an ISO repair kit? Or am I SOL?
If the MD5 checksum does not match, it means the CD image you have does
not match the one that Red Hat/Fedora released. This most likely means one
or more of the files
From: Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 20, 2004 3:20:41 PM EDT
To: GNHLUG Mail Daemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Bittorrent Fedora Core 2 MD5 failures?
Head's up to anyone considering using bittorrent to download FC2. After 48 hours of happy up- and down-loading, I
Good day, all,
The Fedora project released their Core2 distribution today. For
those interested in getting it...
The best answer I've found for the ISO images is the bittorrent
tool. Each person downloading blocks of the files can also upload those
blocks to other peopl
in
> would work, so this 'bug' only forced two logins every time the machine
> was rebooted. With Fedora Core 1, this 'workaround' no longer works.
> You can't login to X with KeyChain in your .bash_profile. I removed
> KeyChain from my .bash_profile and start
ted. With Fedora Core 1, this 'workaround' no longer works.
You can't login to X with KeyChain in your .bash_profile. I removed
KeyChain from my .bash_profile and started the application manually by
simply running the 'Keychain' command from the shell. This works fine,
Thanks Jeff that's exactly what I was looking for.
Ed
Jeff Macdonald wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 06:02, Ed Robbins wrote:
I just installed Fedora core 2 on my laptop and I'm trying to find a way
to config XFree86 after install. I haven't used any redhat stuff in a
while, b
On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 06:02, Ed Robbins wrote:
> I just installed Fedora core 2 on my laptop and I'm trying to find a way
> to config XFree86 after install. I haven't used any redhat stuff in a
> while, but I can't find the usual tools like redhat-config-xfree86, or
>
Hi,
> I just installed Fedora core 2 on my laptop and I'm trying to
> find a way
> to config XFree86 after install. I haven't used any redhat
> stuff in a
> while, but I can't find the usual tools like
> redhat-config-xfree86, or
> Xconfigurator, xf86c
I just installed Fedora core 2 on my laptop and I'm trying to find a way
to config XFree86 after install. I haven't used any redhat stuff in a
while, but I can't find the usual tools like redhat-config-xfree86, or
Xconfigurator, xf86config, etc...
I'm trying to add an
I have just recently installed Fedora (upgraded from 7.3) and have run
into two problems, One with my printers, and the other seems to be an
issue with the X terminal.
I am trying to set up an HP Laserjet 3p(which was working fine with 7.3)
, and when I go through the printer configuration gui, I
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:15:52AM -0400, Sharpe, Richard wrote:
> Hi
>
> Has anyone tried Red Hat's Fedora ? and where did you download it from
> the Red Hat site seems to always be busy and not accepting connections and I
> don't seem to find it on the mirrors,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 09:15:52AM -0400, Sharpe, Richard wrote:
> Has anyone tried Red Hat's Fedora ? and where did you download it from
> the Red Hat site seems to always be busy and not accepting connections and I
> don't
Title: Message
Hi
Has anyone tried Red Hat's Fedora ? and where did you download it from the Red
Hat site seems to always be busy and not accepting connections and I don't seem
to find it on the mirrors, or it could be my bad eye sight.
Rich
Richard A Sharpe
(DBA) Sql
201 - 260 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
