On 12/14/05, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> You would do this with signed code and a crypto provider.
>> Yah, we've seen how well that works for MSIE and ActiveX. :-P
>
> I know you're not crazy ...
Debatable.
> ... so we'll assume that's doubly facetious and
> you're not hold
On Dec 14, 2005, at 19:57, Ben Scott wrote:
So I assume your remark was
intended to be about something more, yes? :)
Yes, the ability to hack the hardware you own.
You would do this with signed code and a crypto provider.
Yah, we've seen how well that works for MSIE and ActiveX. :-P
I
On 12/14/05, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2005, at 15:02, Ben Scott wrote:
>> On 12/14/05, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> ... (or even better - Java) ...
>>
>> Oh, great, as if PCs full of spyware aren't bad enough.
>
> Do cable boxes have spyware problems
On Dec 14, 2005, at 15:02, Ben Scott wrote:
... (or even better - Java) ...
Oh, great, as if PCs full of spyware aren't bad enough.
Do cable boxes have spyware problems? You would do this with signed
code and a crypto provider.
You have basically three choices:
1) cable card as
