> I don't think we can reach that conclusion. Jim posted a message
> to the public GNHLUG mailing list that included a web address.
Hey, right! now that you mention it (duh) isn't that how WWW
indexing is *designed* to work in the first place? ;->
Forgot about the archived GNHLUG postings, a
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Michael ODonnell <
michael.odonn...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> ... just that it was surprising (disappointing?)
> to learn that URLs obtained from sources other than WWW
> crawling were used to get find WWW pages that were "hidden"
> using only a security-by-obscurit
> Any suggestion that LUG communication is being specifically and
> intentionally monitored by Google or others would be laughable.
> So can we please not go there?
I didn't get the impression that specific monitoring of GNHLUG
was suggested, just that it was surprising (disappointing?)
to learn
