I needed to install a small hub in part of the build that was not on
the network. When I connected the hub to the switch from the crossover
port the whole network came crashing to the ground and the server locked
up hard. Upon further investigation it turns out that the RJ45 jacks
were wired c
L PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neal Richardson
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Network problem
I needed to install a small hub in part of the build that was not on
the network. When I connected the hub to the switch from the crossover
port the whole networ
ave the network protection of
a true multi-port switch.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neal Richardson
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Network problem
I needed to install a small hub in part of
Stephen Ingham wrote:
A good repeater hub will automatically turn off a port when 32 consecutive
collisions are detected.
Humm. A collision is defined as a system following the Ethernet CSMA/CD
rules that detects a different bit pattern on the receive pair Vs. what
it is currently sending out on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Brenton
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:57 PM
To: Stephen Ingham
Cc: 'Neal Richardson'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network problem
Stephen Ingham wrote:
>
> A good repeater hub will automatically turn off a port when 32 consecutive
&g
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neal Richardson
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 8:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network problem
It is a CNet dual speed hub the switch I believe is also cheap but I do
not recall the manufacturer
Stephen Ingham wrote:
>Question: Wha
Stephen Ingham wrote:
A repeater is more complicated than a "line amplifier" as Chris described it
below.
Actually, its not. Of course vendors are always free to add features.
Routers by definition simply route traffic and don't filter it, and yet
that's a feature most of us have learned to expec
once again ive forgotten to change the 'To:' to the list... *sigh*
--- Forwarded Message
To: Chris Brenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Network problem
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:56:37 EDT."
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:
Tom Fogal wrote:
once again ive forgotten to change the 'To:' to the list... *sigh*
and my response was
Original Message
Subject: Re: Network problem
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 07:00:14 -0400
From: Chris Brenton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Tom Fogal <[EMAIL PRO
I'm assuming Tom forgot to re-all on his note again so I've cc'd the group.
Tom Fogal wrote:
Now that I look it up, it is not as specific as either of us thought. In 802.3
it is simply defined (in clause 1.4.81) as 'A condition that results from
concurrent transmissions from multiple data terminal
> I'm assuming Tom forgot to re-all on his note again so I've cc'd the group.
indeed, hahah.
i remembered this time though!
> Tom Fogal wrote:
> >
> > Now that I look it up, it is not as specific as either of us thought. In 802.3
> > it is simply defined (in clause 1.4.81) as 'A condition that r
f
you use cheap hubs.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Brenton
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 8:10 AM
To: Stephen Ingham
Cc: 'Neal Richardson'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Network problem
Stephen Ingham wrote:
> A repeater
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, at 8:56pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since a hub is little more than a line amplifier, it does not "transmit"
> per CSMA/CD, and thus has no way of detecting collisions. If a hub had
> this type capability, we really would not need switching as it would be
> trivial to retime
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, at 8:09am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> The following is a quote from "Cabletron Systems - Ethernet Technology
>> Guide" Page 7-4.
>
> LOL! Oh ya, let's quote Cabletron because they are *so* well known for
> their stability and market share in the industry. ;-)
How about IEE
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, at 7:20pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Warning: Many cheap multi-port 10/100 "switches" are not true switches but
> are really two repeaters plus a 2 port switch. A 10Mbit and a 100Mbit
> repeater connected to all ports
FYI, any "dual speed repeater" operates this way (more
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 18:34, Neal Richardson wrote:
> I needed to install a small hub in part of the build that was not on
> the network. When I connected the hub to the switch from the crossover
> port the whole network came crashing to the ground and the server locked
> up hard. Upon further
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 18:34, Neal Richardson wrote:
>
> My question is this: Is this normal behavior to have the whole network
> go down due to a mis wired cable. I can understand the hub not working
> but to cause the whole thing to crash seams bizarre to me
Well, I have seen stranger thin
Hello again!
It's been a while since I've been in any way active in this LUG, but I'm
back...
...and I've come across an error I thought I would never see.
$ ping NNN.NNN.NNN.NNN
connect: No buffer space available
$
The system is a Crusoe TM5600 (Fujitsu P2046) w/ 256MB RAM and running
the lat
This looks like a local configuration or IP stack problem to me. Not a
network problem.
Try 'ifconfig' and see if it IDs your network card and IP Address.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Chabot
Sent: Wednesday, Septembe
Here's the deal.
533 > ls -l /etc/hosts
-rw-r--r--2 root root 264 Mar 7 2004 /etc/hosts
534 >
Here are the relevant entries from the file:
535 > cat /etc/hosts
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs
# that require network functionality will fail.
127.0.0.1
IL PROTECTED]>
=>Sent: Sat Dec 11 16:56:21 2004
=>Subject: I have a network problem with my hosts file :-(
=>
=>Here's the deal.
=>
=>533 > ls -l /etc/hosts
=>-rw-r--r--2 root root 264 Mar 7 2004 /etc/hosts
=>534 >
=>
=>Here are the relev
On Saturday, Dec 11th 2004 at 22:25 -0500, quoth Dan Jenkins:
=>> -Original Message-
=>> From: Steven W. Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
=>> To: Greater New Hampshire Linux User Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
=>> Sent: Sat Dec 11 16:56:21 2004
=>> Subject: I
On Sunday, Dec 12th 2004 at 21:35 -0500, quoth Fred:
=>On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 18:19, Steven W. Orr wrote:
=>...
=>> =>
=>> =>BTW, dig would reference a DNS server, not a hosts file, AFAIK.
=>>
=>> This is interesting. I did not know this.
=>>
=>> Epilogue:
=>>
=>> I don't know why, but now it al
On Dec 13, 2004, at 10:16, Steven W. Orr wrote:
dig or nslookup only goes through a dns server. Is there
such a thing that tells me how the resolver decides which szource it
got
its answer from?
This isn't exactly what you asked for but it may help - it's a script I
wrote to help me resolve addre
al Message-
From: Steven W. Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Greater New Hampshire Linux User Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sat Dec 11 16:56:21 2004
Subject: I have a network problem with my hosts file :-(
Here's the deal.
533 > ls -l /etc/hosts
-rw-r--r--2 root root
-Original Message-
From: Steven W. Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Greater New Hampshire Linux User Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sat Dec 11 16:56:21 2004
Subject: I have a network problem with my hosts file :-(
Here's the deal.
533 ls -l /etc/hosts
-rw-r--r--2 root
On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 18:19, Steven W. Orr wrote:
...
> =>
> =>BTW, dig would reference a DNS server, not a hosts file, AFAIK.
>
> This is interesting. I did not know this.
>
> Epilogue:
>
> I don't know why, but now it all works again. Obviously a sign from the
> multiverse telling me I need t
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 10:16:05AM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote:
> Is there such a thing that tells me how the resolver decides which
> szource it got its answer from?
Yes, the resolver man page does that. Try this:
$ man 5 resolver
If you mean to ask if there is a way to determine from what so
28 matches
Mail list logo
