Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11/4/05, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Labeling this OT since it only applies to a server environment, and
could even apply to other OS's, though Why would you want to do
that?]
#ifdef RANT
I think it's a damn freaking shame that we can
On 11/7/05, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or, it goes to prove there's more interest in the technically-related
political threads ...
You incorrectly perceive a few people making a lot of noise as
widespread interest.
I'll also dispute the technically-related claim; most of this
On 11/4/05, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Labeling this OT since it only applies to a server environment, and
could even apply to other OS's, though Why would you want to do
that?]
#ifdef RANT
I think it's a damn freaking shame that we can have a 70 message
thread in which a few
hey, why doesn't this list have [gnhlug] on the subject line..
we should do that..
(this is a joke)
Ben Scott wrote:
On 11/4/05, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Labeling this OT since it only applies to a server environment, and
could even apply to other OS's, though Why would you
On 11/4/05, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Labeling this OT since it only applies to a server environment, and
could even apply to other OS's, though Why would you want to do
that?]
#ifdef RANT
I think it's a damn freaking shame that we can have a 70 message
thread in which a
I think it's a damn freaking shame that we can have a 70 message
thread in which a few people endlessly debate the evils of tool
booths, but someone posting a legitimate, technical discussion feels
compelled to mark the thread off-topic.
Well, with the new server, we can run a version of
