On 6/15/07, Mark Komarinski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I haven't checked to see what PCI-X/PCI-E does, but I've hit pretty high
speeds with it (see below).
I looked it up last night. According to the always reliable
Wikipedia, PCI-X brings the bus clock to 133 MHz. Still 64-bit. So
8512
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 22:16 -0400, Paul Lussier wrote:
Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On top of that, if hdparm says timed disk writes are around 40MB, what
could you see for sustained download speeds? Maybe a static cached
webpage could saturate a gig connection, sustained 5 gig
I'm not the best with these bit/byte problems so I might be wrong,
but.
A PCI bus can pass 1056 bits a second (32 bit, 33 mhz)
tcp/ip over head is somewhere around %20 (1056 * .8 = 844.8)
What can you reasonably expect a pci gigabit card to give you for
through put?
PCI Buses are generally
On 6/14/07, Flaherty, Patrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not the best with these bit/byte problems so I might be wrong,
but.
A PCI bus can pass 1056 bits a second (32 bit, 33 mhz)
tcp/ip over head is somewhere around %20 (1056 * .8 = 844.8)
What can you reasonably expect a pci gigabit
On 6/14/07, Jeff Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What can you reasonably expect a pci gigabit card to give you for
through put?
I thought I read somewhere gig ether should be on the motherboard, not PCI.
Many modern motherboards do include one or more gig Ether ports.
Sometimes, these
PCI-32 theoretical maximum throughput would be:
(((33 million cycles) * 32 bits) / 8 = 132 million bytes ) per second
...but since that's unattainable for more than a dozen ticks or so I'm
guessing that 2/3 of that (88 million) is a more reasonable maximum.
Meanwhile, I (think I) have
Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On top of that, if hdparm says timed disk writes are around 40MB, what
could you see for sustained download speeds? Maybe a static cached
webpage could saturate a gig connection, sustained 5 gig http download
couldn't right?
Anyone have real world
