Re: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-10 Thread Fred
On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 11:02 -0500, Ted Roche wrote: ... > However, this is often the only networking channel many folks have, and > I don't mind the occasional digressions about "how 'bout them Sox?' or > 'looking for a job' or 'anyone want to buy an old snowmobile,' as long > as the level of ch

Re: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-10 Thread Ted Roche
On Jan 9, 2005, at 12:54 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote: Should we make political diatribes like this explicitly off-topic on gnhlug-discuss? Much as I want to vote yes, I have to say 'No.' I would ask that folks involved in such discussions flag them with [OT] in the subject, so those of us (like me)

RE: [OT] Re: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-10 Thread Whelan, Paul
g. That's my 2 cents. c-ya Paul -Original Message- From: Drew Van Zandt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 10:17 AM To: GNHLUG Subject: [OT] Re: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...) I don't recall anyone suggesting a mo

Re: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-10 Thread Travis Roy
I agree with Will And the thread that started this RFC, I never read one message from it, I could tell what it was just by the subject and deleted it. I suggest you do the same if you don't like the thread. I have to disagree, and it may be due to how I read the list. I get the "Daily Digest"

Re: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-10 Thread Bill McGonigle
On Jan 9, 2005, at 12:54 PM, Benjamin Scott wrote: If someone really wants it, I'm sure we can create [EMAIL PROTECTED] to give those interested a forum for this kind of thing. (But see point #2 above.) Since there are all sorts of possible off-topic threads (e.g. bread recipes) I'd suggest [

[OT] Re: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-10 Thread Drew Van Zandt
I don't recall anyone suggesting a moderated list, just some demonstration of self-control. At a minimum I'd say any such threads should have [OT] in the subject line, so my computer can do the filtering, rather than ME doing it. Maybe you don't mind vgrepping out the noise, but I begrudge the

Re: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-10 Thread Charles Farinella
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 12:54, Benjamin Scott wrote: > I hereby submit the following Request For Comment to the membership of > this list: Should we make political diatribes like this explicitly off-topic > on gnhlug-discuss? Yes. --charlie -- Charles Farinella Appropriate Solutions, Inc. (ww

Re: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-10 Thread Fred
On Sun, 2005-01-09 at 20:04 -0500, Jon maddog Hall wrote: > Hi, > > The current "Off Topic" discussion was started by an observation that the US > economy is not considered as "free" as others, nor as "free" as what it had > been. I (for one) felt that this was a reasonable topic for a list about

RE: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-10 Thread Will Johnson
I have to disagree, and it may be due to how I read the list. I get the "Daily Digest" format of the list. I really don't care if there are 2, 5, 10 or 50 messages in a day, I scan through the headers and go to just the messages on topics of interest to me. I view message boards like this one

Re: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-09 Thread Jon maddog Hall
Hi, The current "Off Topic" discussion was started by an observation that the US economy is not considered as "free" as others, nor as "free" as what it had been. I (for one) felt that this was a reasonable topic for a list about "free and open source software", and one where we sometimes discuss

RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-09 Thread Bill Freeman
Ben, I'm in favor of such a rule. I would, however, like to hear your bread recipes. Bill ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mail

Re: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-09 Thread Benjamin Scott
This is a reply to a message in a different thread ("Linux Cafe") which, although it was posted before this thread, is very relevant to this thread. On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, at 5:19pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have no problem with topic-oriented groups at all. However, with all > the topic grou

Re: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-09 Thread paul.cour1
PROTECTED]> > Date: 2005/01/09 Sun PM 12:54:14 EST > To: Greater NH Linux User Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...) > > > Well, once again, someone decided to barge onto the list, post some random &g

Re: RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-09 Thread Drew Van Zandt
I hate to agree, but I must. While political discussion that's obviously strongly related to Linux seems fine to me (e.g. DMCA and similar), the lengthy and frequent posts that are obviously not at all Linux related have gotten quite irritating. If you start one of these threads with someone, TAK

RFC: Make political discussion off-topic by rule (was: America ...)

2005-01-09 Thread Benjamin Scott
Well, once again, someone decided to barge onto the list, post some random political diatribe that had nothing to do with Linux, and it spun into a 30+ message thread that had nothing to do with Linux, and indeed, little to do with anything other then general complaining. The long, obscure te