Re: Responsibility for Enet link state

2005-11-07 Thread Michael ODonnell
>Try adding > > ETHTOOL_OPTS="speed 100 duplex full autoneg off" That looks promising. Thanks! ___ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss

Re: Responsibility for Enet link state

2005-11-07 Thread Kevin D. Clark
Michael ODonnell writes: > What entity, if any, on an Enet-equipped system is > responsible for seeing to it that the interfaces are > live and operating at (somebody's definition of) the > "proper" speed/duplex/etc? ifup, nowadays. ethtool is wrapped in there too. Try adding ETHTOOL_OPTS

Responsibility for Enet link state

2005-11-07 Thread Michael ODonnell
What entity, if any, on an Enet-equipped system is responsible for seeing to it that the interfaces are live and operating at (somebody's definition of) the "proper" speed/duplex/etc? I'm asking because we have some systems running RHEL4 with some 10/100 NICs that occasionally wake up confused su