At this point, the subject line has become something of an in-joke,
although I will concede I may be the only one in on it.
Oh no! Actually, I should have known better than to be sipping coffee while
opening this thread... Ah well, that's why there's a stack of keyboards
over there...
And
Most people seem to be doing just one distribution. Is anyone else doing
multiples?
I'm running:
Xubuntu on my laptop (I wanted to learn some debianisms)
WinXP on the family PC
MacOSX on the family Macintosh
Fedora on my home server (I grew up w/ RedHat/Mandrake after starting w/
On 2/27/07, Star [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Next on the adgenda... Gnome is so much better than KDE because...
Oh sure. Ben spends a half an hour crafting 'the perfect intro' to
flame city, and what do you respond with?
A one liner.. Shoulda known part II would suck. :-)
--
-- Thomas
Just Debian at home work, and one of the FC's on a webserver... and
the FC will go away shortly, I don't have enough knowledge of weird
corners to keep it uncrufted under the onslaught of hey I'm
installing foo from the guy I was sharing the server with, who's just
competent enough to be
On 2/27/07, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most people seem to be doing just one distribution.
I just *complain* about one distribution. ;-) I use a bunch of 'em.
I still have that Debian install on my main PC at home, tho I'm not
using it right now. I've also got FC5 (soon to be
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 08:59 am, Tom Buskey wrote:
Most people seem to be doing just one distribution. Is anyone else doing
multiples?
Debian Stable on my desktop.
Debian Stable on my laptop.
Debian Stable on home firewall/router/VPN endpoint.
Kubuntu on wife's laptop and Win2K on wife's
On 2/27/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/27/07, Tom Buskey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most people seem to be doing just one distribution.
I just *complain* about one distribution. ;-) I use a bunch of 'em.
Which means you have a basis for your complaints, having used more then
On Tuesday 27 February 2007 09:59 am, Ben Scott wrote:
LVM (which I use extensively) is really nice for trying multiple
distributions. Virtualization (VMware, Xen, etc.) is making that
practice obsolete, but at least right now, IME, a VM is still not the
same as running something on the
OSX On my Macbook (with a WinXP Parallels VM for work stuff)
Ubuntu Server on my colo server
Ubuntu Server on my home server (file/print)
KnoppMyth on my new MythTV box in the basement
and a mix of CentOS and Fedora at work
I also have an old Dell laptop for a backup that runs WinXP.
On Feb
On Feb 27, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Tom Buskey wrote:
Most people seem to be doing just one distribution. Is anyone else
doing multiples?
Similar. FC6/Ubuntu LTS/WinXPPro on the primary laptop, OS X Tiger
primary desktop, in-house servers running FC version x, CentOS.
Commercial servers
On 2/27/07, Ted Roche [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 27, 2007, at 8:59 AM, Tom Buskey wrote:
Most people seem to be doing just one distribution. Is anyone else
doing multiples?
I've run a little bit of everything over the years, and enjoy
tinkering with various things. Good for me, since
On 2/26/07, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This illustrates 2 of the things I really like about Debian:
Oh boy! As it happens, I spent part of the weekend mothballing my
installation of Etch (which I've been using for 6+ months) and
installing FC6. So this is tapping right into
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 06:34:36PM -0500, Ben Scott wrote:
On 2/26/07, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and they don't make into testing without going through unstable for a
while.
I thought things only had to be in unstable for seven days,
without any issues being filed against
On Monday 26 February 2007 06:34 pm, Ben Scott wrote:
On 2/26/07, Paul Lussier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If esr moves to Debian and sticks with stable he won't have *these*[1]
problems.
You can screw up just about any system, including one running Debian
stable
He made a point about
On 2/26/07, Neil Joseph Schelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why does everything have to be a flame war? Your response fits in a flame
war, but not his.
Actually, my response was more like a desultory, goalless rant (very
similar to ESR's original post, in fact). To be a proper flame, I
have to
15 matches
Mail list logo
