On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:13:31 -0500
Greg Rundlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed that Microsoft has used the acronym 'RMS' to stand for
'Rights Management Services'[1]. That has got to drive the real RMS
nuts. Well, actually, I can't speak for him, but it kinda drives me
nuts
tongue.insert (head-cheek);
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, at 11:57pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would not be so quick to dismiss the possibility of conscious acronym
overloading on the part of a company who supposedly considered the
application of the HAL naming algorithm (IBM+1) in naming Windows NT
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 09:28, Benjamin Scott wrote:
tongue.insert (head-cheek);
[snip]
You do realize that Microsoft is not, in fact, staffed by physical
incarnations of pure evil, I hope.
Of course not! One would expect that the purity level varies markedly,
from one minion to the next;
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, at 10:13pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed that Microsoft has used the acronym 'RMS' to stand for
'Rights Management Services'[1]. That has got to drive the real RMS nuts.
I highly doubt Windows Rights Management Services has any connection at
all to Richard
got to drive RMS nuts
To: Greater NH Linux User Group gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005, at 10:13pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed that Microsoft has used the acronym 'RMS' to
stand for
'Rights Management Services'[1]. That has got to drive the
real RMS nuts.
I
I just noticed that Microsoft has used the acronym 'RMS' to stand for
'Rights Management Services'[1]. That has got to drive the real RMS
nuts. Well, actually, I can't speak for him, but it kinda drives me
nuts because it seems like they are using their marketing dollars in a
thinly veiled
As everybody knows, RMS is an acronym for
Root Mean Square, a.k.a. Donald Rumsfeld...
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
