> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:36:39 -0400
> From: Tom Buskey
> > >> find . -mtime 60
> > >
> > >Doesn't mtime's arg mean that many days ago? So you're asking find
> > >to mention files 60 days old, I think. Is that what you intended?
> >
> > I actually should have said, "So you're asking find to
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Michael ODonnell <
michael.odonn...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> >> find . -mtime 60
> >
> >Doesn't mtime's arg mean that many days ago? So you're asking find
> >to mention files 60 days old, I think. Is that what you intended?
>
> I actually should have said, "So
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 12:10 -0400, Alan Johnson wrote:
> I think my brain is melting. Any find gurus out there that answer
> this question: what stupid thing am I doing wrong here?
> ajohn...@ajohnson-laptop:~/performance/wslavedb1$ ls -lt | tail -n 5
> -rw-r--r-- 1 ajohnson ajohnson 222305 2008-
Alan,
You ARE going to hate yourself.
"find" probably found them, but you have to tell find to *do* something.
try
find . -mtime 60 -print
You may now kick yourself. :-)
md
--
Jon "maddog" Hall
Executive Director Linux International(R)
email: mad...@li.org 80 Amherst St.
V
>> find . -mtime 60
>
>Doesn't mtime's arg mean that many days ago? So you're asking find
>to mention files 60 days old, I think. Is that what you intended?
I actually should have said, "So you're asking find to mention files
last modified 60 days ago"
__
> find . -mtime 60
Doesn't mtime's arg mean that many days ago? So you're asking find
to mention files 60 days old, I think. Is that what you intended?
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/l
I think my brain is melting. Any find gurus out there that answer this
question: what stupid thing am I doing wrong here?
ajohn...@ajohnson-laptop:~/performance/wslavedb1$ ls -lt | tail -n 5
-rw-r--r-- 1 ajohnson ajohnson 222305 2008-10-01 12:00
2008-10-01_0800.vmstat.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 ajohnson ajo
