[order of quotations changed slightly for editorial purposes]
On Jan 10, 2008 10:57 PM, Ric Werme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Scott misread my mail and got bent outta shape:
I didn't get bent outta shape. (My mind was already twisted. ;-) )
I just listed reasons why I felt my opinion of t
Ben Scott misread my mail and got bent outta shape:
>On Jan 9, 2008 1:42 AM, Ric Werme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe we could keep everything in a binary database. We'll call it a
registry.
>>>
>>> DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DI-- Er, sorry. Reflex action.
>>
>> DIE
On Monday, Jan 7th 2008 at 16:31 -, quoth Bill McGonigle:
=>OK, another unix operations theory question:
=>
=> What's the best way to maintain installs of applications?
=>
=>For instance, take mysql as an average example. For a mysql install,
=>I'll have all of the application binaries an
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:26:59AM -0500, Kent Johnson wrote:
> Bill McGonigle wrote:
>
> > cfengine looks like it might be that tool. I'm going to go do some
> > reading. Thanks to Tom & Shawn for the pointer!
>
> You might also look at Puppet which claims "Puppet could be said to be
> the
Bill McGonigle wrote:
> cfengine looks like it might be that tool. I'm going to go do some
> reading. Thanks to Tom & Shawn for the pointer!
You might also look at Puppet which claims "Puppet could be said to be
the next-generation cfengine. The overall design is heavily influenced
by cfeng
On Jan 7, 2008, at 16:55, Ben Scott wrote:
> I honestly think that documentation and discipline are just
> essential for this. "You can't comb a hairy ball smooth." If you
> carefully document everything you do, recreating it is
> straight-forward. If you don't document it, well... you reap
On Jan 9, 2008 1:42 AM, Ric Werme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Maybe we could keep everything in a binary database. We'll call it a
>>> registry.
>>
>> DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DI-- Er, sorry. Reflex action.
>
> DIE is too strong a word. Replace, simplify, constrain are far more
>
> On Jan 7, 2008 4:53 PM, Tom Buskey wrote:
> > Maybe we could keep everything in a binary database. We'll call it a
> > registry.
>
> DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DI-- Er, sorry. Reflex action.
> -- Ben
When I got my Vantage Pro Weather Station, I wrote Python code to
connect it to
Bill McGonigle writes:
> OK, another unix operations theory question:
>
>What's the best way to maintain installs of applications?
I know this isn't a magic wand, but I find that if there is some
that I really have a lot invested in, I typically document
for myself what I did to setup this
On Jan 7, 2008 4:58 PM, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2008 4:53 PM, Tom Buskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe we could keep everything in a binary database. We'll call it a
> > registry.
>
> DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DI-- Er, sorry. Reflex action.
I was in a
On 1/7/08, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, another unix operations theory question:
>
>What's the best way to maintain installs of applications?
This may not be as useful for small scale implementations, but I know of
some sites (including other groups here where I work) tha
On Jan 7, 2008 4:53 PM, Tom Buskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe we could keep everything in a binary database. We'll call it a
> registry.
DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DI-- Er, sorry. Reflex action.
-- Ben
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing lis
On Jan 7, 2008 4:31 PM, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the best way to maintain installs of applications?
Pay somebody else to do it. ;-)
>This would be easier if there were /etc/sysconfig/iptables.d/mysql
> and /etc/sysctl.d/mysql.conf, but there aren't (yet).
Patch
Maybe we could keep everything in a binary database. We'll call it a
registry.
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/
On Jan 7, 2008 4:31 PM, Bill McGonigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, another unix operations theory question:
>
> What's the best way to maintain installs of applications?
RPM, DEB, Solaris packages. Know the app & it's configuration files. Then
you can reinstall from a kickstart/jumpstar
OK, another unix operations theory question:
What's the best way to maintain installs of applications?
For instance, take mysql as an average example. For a mysql install,
I'll have all of the application binaries and support files, but I'll
also have, probably, an /etc/my.cnf and entries
16 matches
Mail list logo
