> >
> > Tell that to my daughter. She prefers to crank out HTML by hand ...
>
> Me too. I strongly suspect we're a tiny minority.
>
Count me in on this one. I have spent more time than I care to keep track of
(unless it's billable) cleaning up WYSIWYG wreckage.
> _
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, at 7:01pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alas, human-friendly HTML is becoming rarer and rarer everyday. These
days, it almost seems like HTML is seen more like program output (like
object code) then something you can actually design and write yourself.
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, at 7:01pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Alas, human-friendly HTML is becoming rarer and rarer everyday. These
>> days, it almost seems like HTML is seen more like program output (like
>> object code) then something you can actually design and write yourself.
>
> Tell that to m
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 19:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> Alas, human-friendly HTML is becoming rarer and rarer everyday. These
> days, it almost seems like HTML is seen more like program output (like
> object code) then something you can actually design and write yourself.
Tell that to my da
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, at 1:07am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was developing a CD-ROM product which contains multiple Microsoft
> PowerPointless (tm) presentations.
You might as well give up on any hope of doing anything
standards-compliant right there. :-/
Pedantic clarification: This isn't
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, at 12:19am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please take the time to trim quoted material from your posts.
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, at 12:19am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please take the time to trim quoted material from your posts.
Please take the time to trim duplicated list-postin
On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 11:19, Derek Martin wrote:
...
> And these experiences taught you not to ever use another Microsoft
> product, right? ;-)
You get what you deserve when you choose Microsoft.
(yes, you may quote me on this)
--
Fred -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- place "[hey]" in your subject.
The
On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 10:24, Hewitt Tech wrote:
...
> You bring up an interesting observation about Microsoft's application
> products. Microsoft seems to specialize in making applications that are
> incompatible or difficult to mimic. One product that I found rather
> obnoxious is their "Picture I
reg Rundlett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 1:07 AM
> Subject: rant on pathetic example of Microsoft FUD
>
> > I was developing a CD-ROM product which contains multiple Microsoft
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Rundlett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2004 1:07 AM
Subject: rant on pathetic example of Microsoft FUD
> I was developing a CD-ROM product which contains mult
I was developing a CD-ROM product which contains multiple Microsoft
PowerPointless (tm) presentations. The CD would launch an html Table of
Contents page using auto-run. To make the TOC page layout the same as
the .ppt files, I simply created a slide in PowerPoint with appropriate
links to th
11 matches
Mail list logo
