On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Michael ODonnell <
michael.odonn...@comcast.net> wrote:
> However, being a hot copy means any
> filesystem metadata would be in whatever state the failed node left
> them, which may or may not be an acceptable risk in some situations.
> Some sort of distributed fi
> To my knowledge DBRD can only do mirroring. So no higher RAID
> levels are supported.
That's my understanding, too. So, in an Active/Standby situation (at
least the ones in the configs we had rigged up) DRBD could provide you
with a hot block-level copy on the Standby machine that you'd hope
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Alan Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Mark Komarinski
> wrote:
>
>> As pointed out before, DRBD can do active/active, so long as the
>> filesystem on top support it (GFS2 and OCFS2). The DRBD team even has
>> documentation to get you started:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Mark Komarinski wrote:
> As pointed out before, DRBD can do active/active, so long as the
> filesystem on top support it (GFS2 and OCFS2). The DRBD team even has
> documentation to get you started:
>
> http://www.drbd.org/users-guide/ch-gfs.html
> http://www.drbd
On 02/29/2012 10:22 AM, Kenny Lussier wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Michael ODonnell
> mailto:michael.odonn...@comcast.net>>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > (DRBD>LVM>iSCSI>Heartbeat)
>
> Heh. I suspect that will somehow look familiar to Mr. Lussier... ;->
>
> He did indicate a
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Michael ODonnell <
michael.odonn...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > (DRBD>LVM>iSCSI>Heartbeat)
>
> Heh. I suspect that will somehow look familiar to Mr. Lussier... ;->
>
> He did indicate a wish to have an Active/Active rig but I believe
> that approach only allows
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Alan Johnson wrote:
> It was tricky to setup at the time, but they were just about
> to launch a major release that was supposed to make everything trivial ...
Aside: I don't think I've ever encountered a software product or
project which wasn't claiming that.
t was
unreliable - if you knew more about pacemaker you might fare better.
-Mark
- Reply message -
From: "Kenny Lussier"
To: "GNHLUG"
Subject: replicated file system?
Date: Tue, Feb 28, 2012 2:44 pm
Hi All,
I am looking for new ideas on how to replicate file systems. I h
r you might fare better.
-Mark
- Reply message -
From: "Kenny Lussier"
To: "GNHLUG"
Subject: replicated file system?
Date: Tue, Feb 28, 2012 2:44 pm
Hi All,
I am looking for new ideas on how to replicate file systems. I have a need for
redundant ftp servers, which could
> (DRBD>LVM>iSCSI>Heartbeat)
Heh. I suspect that will somehow look familiar to Mr. Lussier... ;->
He did indicate a wish to have an Active/Active rig but I believe
that approach only allows Active/Standby, yes?
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
gnhl
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> There *are* distributed filesystems -- btrfs has ceph, which has come a
> long,
> long way. Lustre and Gluster also come to mind. Caveat: I've not used
> these,
>
I worked with the good folks at Gluster at my last job, fall of 2009. They
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote:
> There *are* distributed filesystems -- btrfs has ceph, which has come a
> long,
> long way. Lustre and Gluster also come to mind. Caveat: I've not used
> these,
> but I know folks who have, and I believe they'd fit your bill.
>
> -Ken
>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Kenny Lussier wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am looking for new ideas on how to replicate file systems. I have a need
> for redundant ftp servers, which could either be active/standby or
> active/active, as there is a load balancer in front of them. Currently, we
> period
There *are* distributed filesystems -- btrfs has ceph, which has come a long,
long way. Lustre and Gluster also come to mind. Caveat: I've not used these,
but I know folks who have, and I believe they'd fit your bill.
-Ken
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:44:54 -0500 Kenny Lussier wrote
Hi All, I am
Hi All,
I am looking for new ideas on how to replicate file systems. I have a need
for redundant ftp servers, which could either be active/standby or
active/active, as there is a load balancer in front of them. Currently, we
periodically rsync the directory over to the standby system. What I would
15 matches
Mail list logo
