You don't *have* to open a login session on the remote host:
ports='-L 143:burlma1-smail1.gtei.net:143 -L 110:burlma1-smail1.gtei.net:
110 -L -L 119:news.genuity.net:119'
sudo ssh -2 -C -f -l tbuskey $ports magic.tools.gtei.net '/bin/sleep 2000'
Man ssh:
-f Requests ssh to go to
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 5:06pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> While standing on systemA you say:
>
> When I do that the case sort of crumples.
I guess the system's load average was too high.
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 17:46, you wrote:
> > > While standing on systemA you say:
> >
> > When I do that the case sort of crumples.
>
> Yup - we professionals refer to that
> as "converting to lower case"
Really ? I've always talked about "data compression".
>
> ___
> > While standing on systemA you say:
>
> When I do that the case sort of crumples.
Yup - we professionals refer to that
as "converting to lower case"
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-d
Michael O'Donnell writes:
>While standing on systemA you say:
When I do that the case sort of crumples.
___
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
In a message dated: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:10:42 EDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> *exasperated sigh*
That makes two of us :)
(ever try getting something which *should* be very straight-forward
working *and* tend to the needs of an infant!? :)
> In your examples, you use -R instead of -L, and you
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:36pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> pll@tater:~$ ssh taz -R 8110:199.174.114.33:110
> pll@tater:~$ fetchmail -vc lanminds.com --port 8110 --protocol pop3
*exasperated sigh*
My workstation is named DRAGON. Our mail server is named ITCHY. Say the
intermedia
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:40:11PM -0400, Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:36:21PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've got plenty open, but it doesn't seem to be working the way I
> > expect it to (of course, maybe my expectations are out
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:30pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yes, you do. Unfortunately, ssh ties up a terminal whenever you do a port
> redirection; i.e. you must log into the system to do this.
If this really bothers people that much, and you are using SSH protocol
version 2 (and you *are* doi
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:36:21PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've got plenty open, but it doesn't seem to be working the way I
> expect it to (of course, maybe my expectations are out of line :)
>
> On tater:
>
> pll@tater:~$ ssh taz -R 8110:199.174.114.33:
In a message dated: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:40:07 EDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:09pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Is this supposed to be a single command line, or 2 separate ones?
>
> Two separate ones, both executed on 'A'.
>
>> I would guess 2 separate ones, yet when I do
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 2:52pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> which is slightly different than:
>
> pop.paul.com listens on port 110
> I want the box I'm sshing -to- to listen on 110 and
> connect me with pop.paul.com
> so I do:
> ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At some point hitherto, [EMAIL PROTECTED] hath spake thusly:
> >ssh pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110
> >fetchmail --protocol POP3 --port 8110 localhost
>
> Is this supposed to be a single command line, or 2 separate ones?
Two.
>
> I would guess
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 3:09pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is this supposed to be a single command line, or 2 separate ones?
Two separate ones, both executed on 'A'.
> I would guess 2 separate ones, yet when I do:
> ssh pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110
> I end up logged into system-b
In a message dated: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:02:09 EDT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> For example:
>
>ssh pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110
>fetchmail --protocol POP3 --port 8110 localhost
Is this supposed to be a single command line, or 2 separate ones?
I would guess 2 separate ones, yet when I do:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ssh pll@system-b -L 8110:pop-server:110
> fetchmail --protocol POP3 --port 8110 localhost
I thought -L was for the other forwarding.. for example:
mail.blackavar.com listens on port 25
I want the box I'm SSHing from to listen on port
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, at 1:53pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - run fetchmail on system A, which will redirect the query to system B.
> - have system B intercept that query and pass it on to the
> proper pop server on the net
> - take the mail off the server using B, but p
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - run fetchmail on system A, which will redirect the query to system B.
> - have system B intercept that query and pass it on to the
> proper pop server on the net
> - take the mail off the server using B, but pass it back
>IOW, I want to:
>
>- run fetchmail on system A, which will redirect the query to system B.
>- have system B intercept that query and pass it on to the
> proper pop server on the net
>- take the mail off the server using B, but pass it back to
> syste
Hi all,
I have a system which is not directly connected to the 'net, but
which has direct access to one which does, but is not acting as a
router. I need to get some e-mail off a pop server on the 'net onto
the system which is not directly connected. Is there anyway to use
ssh to redirect
20 matches
Mail list logo