Bill Sconce wrote:
The discussion was about Inc. Incorporating as GNHLUG, Inc.
Nobody would do that either. A voluntary association or not for profit
corporation under NH law is in many ways a corporation and the
corporations laws generally apply, but technically it is not a
corporation
I tossed out an idea at the meeting which, if not well-received, was
at least not immediately tossed back. For the benefit of those who
weren't there:
I propose incorporating our non-profit under a name other than
GNHLUG. For the sake of discussion, let's call this organization "NH
Linux Ween
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:20:13 -0400
Ed Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nobody in their right mind would
> register/form GNLUG as an LLC so I don't know why there is a
> discussion of GNHLUG, LLC.
The discussion was about Inc. Incorporating as GNHLUG, Inc.
-Bill
(The LLC came from me as
I second it.
David Berube
Berube Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(603)-485-9622
http://www.berubeconsulting.com/
Bruce Dawson wrote:
Ben Scott wrote:
On 8/14/06, Ed Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
I find this matter very tiresome and assume that someone will
simply go file the papers and t
Ben Scott wrote:
> On 8/14/06, Ed Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>> I find this matter very tiresome and assume that someone will
>> simply go file the papers and the malcontents can complain in
>> the wilderness to their heart's content.
...
> Tongue-in-cheek: Given that we don't have a d
On 8/14/06, Ed Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... I don't know why there is a discussion of GNHLUG, LLC ...
The only time I've seen mention of "GNHLUG LLC" is in Bill Sconce's
post. I suspect this is Bill's error.
I find this matter very tiresome and assume that someone will
simply go fi
Ed Lawson wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:26:29 -0400
> Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Not me! The duly appointed treasurer has them (who I'm not sure
>> is still aware that she's the treasurer.)
>
> Sounds like negligence to me. And no effort to assure the funds
> were invested to
On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 11:44:17 -0400
Bill Sconce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jim's comments/scenario, according to my notes:
> 1. GNHLUG is a corporation.
> 2. Someone (Martha's, say) lets GNHLUG LLC. have a meeting
upstairs.
First, I suspect I will regret not keeping a personal promise
Ben Scott wrote:
> On 8/14/06, Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think GNHLUG still has $35 to its name.
> It does?!? You've been hoarding funds, then! ;-)
Not me! The duly appointed treasurer has them (who I'm not sure is still
aware that she's the treasurer.)
I haven't checked wit
On 8/14/06, Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Agreed, completely. We need to seek professional advice on this one.
Professional?!
Fortunately, in our case, "professional" does not have to mean
"costs us money". Aside from Ed Lawson's generous help over the
years, some others options
Ben Scott wrote:
> On 8/14/06, Bill Sconce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think because wikis (and mailing lists) LOVE never-ending discussions
>> about how the law works ...
>
> ... as do face-to-face meetings, as I believe our meeting this past
> Saturday demonstrated. We burned an hour (p
On 8/14/06, Bill Sconce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think because wikis (and mailing lists) LOVE never-ending discussions
about how the law works ...
... as do face-to-face meetings, as I believe our meeting this past
Saturday demonstrated. We burned an hour (plus or minus) speculating
about
On Aug 14, 2006, at 11:44, Bill Sconce wrote:
like Debian
is the organization we all know and love and the legal entity is SPI.
That distinction would/might defuse some of these concerns.
We might also talk to the folks at SPI to see how they structure
things. Legal code reuse, if you will.
On 8/14/06, Rob Lembree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll point you to this, and then await Ed's input:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piercing_the_corporate_veil
My understanding of Jim's comments was, essentially, that:
(1) Corporations are expected to have insurance
(2) Not carrying i
I vote for Ted as well.
Take it easy,
David Berube
Berube Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(603)-485-9622
http://www.berubeconsulting.com/
Star wrote:
I think that both of these nominations make a ton of sense.
Add my vote to the "Yay" column!
On 8/13/06, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think that both of these nominations make a ton of sense.Add my vote to the "Yay" column!On 8/13/06, Ben Scott <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Apparently, David Berube has been forced to curtail his involvement
in GNHLUG due to health reasons. This is unfortunately; David is anenthusiastic and inte
Ben notified me that I had posted my mini-drive question to the wrong
list. I've fixed the contact name so that I should not make that
mistake again. (Thanks Ben.)
On a more positive note, I think Ted and Ben are excellent choices to
lead us.
--
Lloyd Kvam
Venix Corp
Our thoughts for David from the Mondadnock area, for his health.
And I second that nomination...
Guy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Scott
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2006 11:57 PM
To: GNHLUG Organizational Issues
Subject: Fearless leade
18 matches
Mail list logo
