On Nov 1, 2007, at 21:19, Ben Scott wrote:
On 11/1/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did not ask about checks that needed two signatures. I have never
used these in an organization. I rely on the treasurer ...
That was my thinking as well, but the rest of the board seemed
On 11/2/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For clarification, I set up an account for Linux International, not
GNHLUG.
Oh.
Thanks for catching that, Dave!
Okay, new new new new plan: Baring crisises at work (which are
depressingly common), I will call Ocean Bank today, and
On Friday 02 November 2007 07:18, Ben Scott wrote:
On 11/2/07, Bill McGonigle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we want two signatures on a check or two signers on an account?
As I recall, the decision made at the last board meeting was for
two-signature checks. That is, checks printed such
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 07:24:57 -0400
From: Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh.
Thanks for catching that, Dave!
Okay, new new new new plan: Baring crisises at work (which are
depressingly common), I will call Ocean Bank today, and see what they
can tell me over the phone. And I will
Where were you single signature people at the last board meeting?
(-- Rhetorical.) :)
I think I was in Addis Ababba, Ethiopia at a UN meeting. ;-}
md
--
Jon maddog Hall
Executive Director Linux International(R)
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 80 Amherst St.
Voice:
On 11/2/07, Ben Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, new new new new plan: Baring crisises at work (which are
depressingly common), I will call Ocean Bank today, and see what they
can tell me over the phone. And I will re-instate my plan to swing by
Citizen's on the way to the museum
On Nov 2, 2007, at 17:19, Ben Scott wrote:
New new new new new (counts yah) plan: I will instead swing by
Ocean Bank on my way to the museum tomorrow morning.
Without trying to dampen your enthusiasm in any way, I'd just like to
note that the pace of change in plans may be indicative
