Re: Draft MythTV proposal - setting expectations **

2007-02-09 Thread Jarod Wilson
Pardon the thread-breaking, hacking this together from list archives, not actual emails... On Thu Feb 8 16:59:35 EST 2007, Ben Scott said: On 2/8/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall wrote: And it works with ... Cable Basic High Def. I'm pretty sure that's wrong in most cases. Most cable operators encr

Re: Draft MythTV proposal - setting expectations **

2007-02-08 Thread Jon 'maddog' Hall
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 17:02 -0500, Ben Scott wrote: > http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Www/MythTV Wow, that was really cool! And I would not dream of heckling you over it! md ___ gnhlug-org mailing list gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnh

Re: Draft MythTV proposal - setting expectations **

2007-02-08 Thread Ben Scott
Er, premature send. On 2/8/07, Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I put together a "Compatability Matrix" on our wiki ... in an effort to help explain this situation: http://wiki.gnhlug.org/twiki2/bin/view/Www/MythTV -- Ben ___ gnhlug-org mailin

Re: Draft MythTV proposal - setting expectations **

2007-02-08 Thread Ben Scott
On 2/8/07, Jon 'maddog' Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And it works with ... Cable Basic High Def. I'm pretty sure that's wrong in most cases. Most cable operators encrypt every High Def cable channel, even Basic Cable. The Local Stations may be sent in the clear, but that's about it. I pu

Re: Draft MythTV proposal - setting expectations **

2007-02-08 Thread Jon 'maddog' Hall
> I'm thinking there are likely 3, maybe 4 major categories of > television user that would want a DVR, at least that I can imagine... > (excluding satellite, although they fall into a similar category as > the "cable box" scenario below)... > > 1 - Basic cable - aka coax cable coming into the