[reply to multiple messages]
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Ted Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And it was an on-topic post, in the sense it was for a computer
> technician.
The list charter is quite explict about requiring "Linux". If
someone wants Dice.com, they know where to find it.
Bill McGonigle wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2008, at 21:12, Bruce Dawson wrote:
>
>> Without a lot of AI, I think it would be more effective to just review
>> each message.
>
> Would it be reasonable to give messages a pass based on a filter, and
> require moderation if they fail that pass?
>
> -Bill
Sure;
On Sep 11, 2008, at 21:12, Bruce Dawson wrote:
> Without a lot of AI, I think it would be more effective to just review
> each message.
Would it be reasonable to give messages a pass based on a filter, and
require moderation if they fail that pass?
-Bill
-
Bill McGonigle, Owner
I think looking for various words can produce both false positives and
false negatives. And you still won't catch everything. Using your
abbreviated list as an example, there's no "perl", "open source", or
kernel keywords.
Also, not all jobs are technical (marketing, sales, ...) Not that we've
see
On Sep 11, 2008, at 20:12, Arc Riley wrote:
> I believe it's easy enough to setup mailman to require "Linux" in
> the body
> of the message. This would deal with both spam and non-linux job
> apps. Add
> a few other possible whitelist keywords (ie, Redhat, Fedora,
> Ubuntu, Suse,
> Python
I believe it's easy enough to setup mailman to require "Linux" in the body
of the message. This would deal with both spam and non-linux job apps. Add
a few other possible whitelist keywords (ie, Redhat, Fedora, Ubuntu, Suse,
Python, Ruby, PHP) and in the rejection message specify that only job ap
On Sep 11, 2008, at 16:42, Ben Scott wrote:
> I should be able to tend the moderator queue myself (it's a very low
> traffic list), but if some other people want to volunteer to assist, I
> won't say no. :)
I was perplexed as well, thanks for the follow-up.
Yeah, if you want to handle the lo
Ben Scott wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 2:29 PM, a message from Courtney Homer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was posted to the gnhlug-jobs mailing list.
> It had no Linux-related content. She quickly followed up with an
> apology to the list-owner address, saying she mistakenly sent her
> message to
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 2:29 PM, a message from Courtney Homer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was posted to the gnhlug-jobs mailing list.
It had no Linux-related content. She quickly followed up with an
apology to the list-owner address, saying she mistakenly sent her
message to the wrong list.
That lis
