On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:44:32PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I think that, at the very least for GNOME 3.4 onwards, we should switch
to using a keyword in bugzilla, and the release-team, docs team and i18n
teams can
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:53, Baptiste Mille-Mathias
baptiste.millemath...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:44:32PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I think that, at the very least for GNOME 3.4 onwards, we should
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:11:13AM +0200, Jorge González wrote:
There could be a shared calendar. I have my own to know when we
release and when are we in string freeze and such. It's very easy.
http://www.gnome.org/start/unstable/schedule.ics
webcal://www.gnome.org/start/unstable/schedule.ics
On 23 September 2011 08:40, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
The Bugzilla way of doing this is to use flags. A flag is either defined
for attachments _or_ (not and) bugs. This is possible on our currently
bugzilla; we just do not use them.
For what it's worth this is exactly what we do in
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:57:15AM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
On 23 September 2011 08:40, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
The Bugzilla way of doing this is to use flags. A flag is either defined
for attachments _or_ (not and) bugs. This is possible on our currently
bugzilla; we just do
On 23 September 2011 10:58, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
For what it's worth this is exactly what we do in MeeGo for
distribution freezes and we find it works very well.
Do you have multiple freezes? Do you use one flag or multiple? How do
you handle multiple teams and e.g. one flag?
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 09:40 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:44:32PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I think that, at the very least for GNOME 3.4 onwards, we should switch
to using a keyword in bugzilla, and the release-team, docs team and i18n
teams can monitor newly
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:51:04PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Here's the workflow with a keyword:
1. Developer adds a patch to an important bug, and realises that the
patch needs to make it to stable during a freeze (possibly through a
banner, auto-updated via ical)
2. Developer adds
On 09/23/2011 07:58 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
I think that will add too much burden on the people who have to approve?
I don't track RSS at all. Release-team gets a lot of freeze breaks and I
want to be notified immediately, not after a delay. I need to see the
comments that other teams make
Do you think it would be useful for French and German readers to have the
platform description on-line at the release date?
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 18:37, Luc Pionchon pionchon@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 18:22, Frederic Peters fpet...@gnome.org wrote:
Hello Luc,
Luc
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 16:29 +0300, Luc Pionchon wrote:
Do you think it would be useful for French and German readers to have
the platform description on-line at the release date?
Do you really expect anybody to answer No?
Apart from rhetorical questions, this will happen if somebody creates a
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 16:39, Andre Klapper ak...@gmx.net wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 16:29 +0300, Luc Pionchon wrote:
Do you think it would be useful for French and German readers to have
the platform description on-line at the release date?
Do you really expect anybody to answer No?
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 15:39 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 16:29 +0300, Luc Pionchon wrote:
Do you think it would be useful for French and German readers to have
the platform description on-line at the release date?
Do you really expect anybody to answer No?
Apart
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 17:28, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 15:39 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 16:29 +0300, Luc Pionchon wrote:
Do you think it would be useful for French and German readers to have
the platform description on-line at
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 21:24 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 22:44 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I think that, at the very least for GNOME 3.4 onwards, we should switch
to using a keyword in bugzilla, and the release-team, docs team and i18n
teams can monitor newly request
Hi!
Instead of keywords, we could just add bugzilla pseudo accounts for
string-freeze-br...@gnome.bugs, ui-freeze-br...@gnome.bugs,
code-freeze-br...@gnome.bugs. Then to request a break, just cc: the
appropriate address on the bug along with a comment explaining why.
Release/docs/i18n team
16 matches
Mail list logo
