I may be biased by having implemented this in the file chooser, but I am
in favor of taking this (keeping the file chooser and nautilus in sync was
one of the major themes of the work in those places this cycle, after all).
You should cc gnome-i18n though, since this adds new strings to nautilus
(
Thanks for the response, ccing gnome-i18n as recommended.
- Original Message -
| I may be biased by having implemented this in the file chooser, but I am
| in favor of taking this (keeping the file chooser and nautilus in sync was
| one of the major themes of the work in those places this
2015-09-02 15:53 GMT+02:00 Carlos Soriano Sanchez :
> Thanks for the response, ccing gnome-i18n as recommended.
>
> - Original Message -
> | I may be biased by having implemented this in the file chooser, but I am
> | in favor of taking this (keeping the file chooser and nautilus in sync wa
On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 15:57 -0400, Carlos Soriano Sanchez wrote:
> Even if it is late, I would like to ask for an UI freeze exception
> for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725939
> The reason is that GtkFileChooser implemented it, but nautilus
> didn't. One of the points for 3.18 was to
Second i18n approval
Cheers!
2015-09-02 18:00 GMT+02:00 Andre Klapper :
> On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 15:57 -0400, Carlos Soriano Sanchez wrote:
> > Even if it is late, I would like to ask for an UI freeze exception
> > for https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725939
> > The reason is that GtkFi
Thanks everyone!
- Original Message -
| Second i18n approval
|
| Cheers!
|
| 2015-09-02 18:00 GMT+02:00 Andre Klapper :
|
| > On Tue, 2015-09-01 at 15:57 -0400, Carlos Soriano Sanchez wrote:
| > > Even if it is late, I would like to ask for an UI freeze exception
| > > for https://bugzi
