Christian Rose wrote:
tor 2005-03-31 klockan 19:02 -0500 skrev Ryan Lortie:
There exists a very simple solution to this problem. Since nobody will
see it anyway, I am more than willing to remove the _() from around the
message in the stable branch.
This means that end users (still) won't be aff
When will be the final date to submit translations for 2.10.1 ?
--
Cheers,
Terance Edward Sola
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
fre, 01 04 2005 kl. 13:36 +0200, skrev Terance Edward Sola:
> When will be the final date to submit translations for 2.10.1 ?
Gnome 2.10.x is in string freeze forever, which mean that Gnome 2.10.1
is also in string freeze and .2, .3 etc. also is.
But I'm not sure when Gnome 2.10.1 will be release
Hi David,
Today at 12:07, David Fraser wrote:
> Speaking as an outsider, this sparked off an idea for me:
> There could be a macro defined, say
> _should_be_translated_but_in_string_freeze_
> This would be defined to just return the string, but would plainly
Actually, if there was such a macro,
