Yesterday at 21:35, William Jon McCann wrote:
> I have branched nautilus-cd-burner. The stable branch is
> gnome-2-12 and development continues on HEAD.
Thanks for the notice. Status pages should show the new branch when
they next update.
Cheers,
Danilo
Yesterday at 17:06, Vincent Noel wrote:
> gnome-utils has been branched for gnome 2.12. Stable releases should
> use the gnome-2-12 branch, while earth-shattering improvements will happen
> on HEAD.
Thanks for the notice. Translation status pages should show the new
branch when they next update.
Today at 5:20, Owen Taylor wrote:
> Something that takes 4 hours of CPU time on window (a day?) probably
> isn't a huge deal ... window isn't terribly CPU-bound currently... and
> the process could be niced down.
Stats are usually done multiple times a day. I am not quite sure of
the current sch
Le vendredi 07 octobre 2005 à 20:12 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit :
> Another disk optimisation is handling of cvs checkouts. For different
> reasons, all cvs checkouts are usually done in full, i.e. checkout is
> first removed, and only then is it "cvs co"ed again. If there was no
> hand tuning of
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 07 octobre 2005 à 20:12 +0200, Danilo Šegan a écrit :
Another disk optimisation is handling of cvs checkouts. For different
reasons, all cvs checkouts are usually done in full, i.e. checkout is
first removed, and only then is it "cvs co"ed again. If there was no
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 20:12 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote:
> > - If it really is that intensive, it's not optimizable, we need it on a
> >gnome.org server, than container is probably the most appropriate
> >home:
> >
> > window: 2 gig ram, 72gig (raid 1) disk, load avg ~1
> > contain
