Re: gedit branched for 2.14

On 3/23/06, Paolo Borelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't forget to branch gedit-plugins too. > gedit-plugins is dead and it's been dead for a long time. Beside even if Danilo, is it a good idea to remove gedit-plugins from translation status page since it won't be active at least the short f

gnopernicus branced

Hi, Gnopernicus has been branched for 2.15 development work. The branch name is gnome-2-14. Regards, Remus ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Re: gnome-nettol seems to hae been branched for gnome-2-14

On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 10:39 +0300, Alexander Shopov wrote: > Hi, gnome nettool seems to have been branched for gnome2-14. Can some of > the maintainers confirm that? > yes, it's been branched. > Can we have the status pages reflect that? > Best regards: > al_shopov -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTEC

gnome-nettol seems to hae been branched for gnome-2-14

Hi, gnome nettool seems to have been branched for gnome2-14. Can some of the maintainers confirm that? Can we have the status pages reflect that? Best regards: al_shopov ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/list