On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 17:50 +0200, Claude Paroz wrote:
> Le mardi 01 mai 2007 à 03:44 +0100, Gnome Status Pages a écrit :
> > This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
> > http://l10n.gnome.org/.
> >
> > There have been following string additions to module 'gtk+.gtk-
Le mardi 01 mai 2007 à 03:44 +0100, Gnome Status Pages a écrit :
> This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
> http://l10n.gnome.org/.
>
> There have been following string additions to module 'gtk+.gtk-2-10':
>
> + "%s job #%d"
>
> Note that this doesn't direct
Le mardi 01 mai 2007 à 03:23 +0100, Gnome Status Pages a écrit :
> This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on:
> http://l10n.gnome.org/.
>
> There have been following string additions to module 'gnome-panel.HEAD':
>
> + "Force the panel to not be automatically res
Le dimanche 29 avril 2007, à 20:57 +0200, Claude Paroz a écrit :
> You're probably right: bug fixes should have priority over string
> freeze. But to be compliant with GNOME procedures, please just ask
> before on gnome-i18n.
Actually, GTK+ doesn't have to follow the GNOME procedures (because it's
Le mardi 01 mai 2007 à 11:41 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> I branched gnome-menus for 2.18. Some string changes and probably other
> changes will go to trunk.
Thanks. l10n.gnome.org updated.
Claude
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
htt
Le lundi 30 avril 2007 à 23:53 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> I branched gnome-panel, gnome-desktop and gnome-session for 2.18. New
> development will happen in trunk.
Thanks. l10n.gnome.org updated.
Claude
___
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome
