Re: removed some modules

Le mercredi 09 janvier 2008 à 00:19 +0100, Gil Forcada a écrit : > hi, > > doing a brand new install in one of my machines I spotted that there > were some modules that were moved to svn-archive.gnome.org but not > removed from DL, I have already removed, just to put to your known > > the affect

Re: What about integration with damned lies?

You're right. It's very uncommon in Brazil but there are many locales where it does happen. Leonardo Fonenelle http://leonardof.org Em Ter, 2008-01-08 às 22:10 +0100, Gudmund Areskoug escreveu: > > Aren't there at least a few translators who translate all manner of > things, be it Gnome, KDE, Ub

removed some modules

hi, doing a brand new install in one of my machines I spotted that there were some modules that were moved to svn-archive.gnome.org but not removed from DL, I have already removed, just to put to your known the affected modules are: gpdf giftoxic gnomechat webeyes evolution-gconf-ldap-backend ch

Re: What about integration with damned lies?

Hello, Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle wrote: > Em Dom, 2008-01-06 às 18:45 +0100, Nacho escreveu: >> I think is better a plugin. Because maybe someone wants to make a >> plugin for kde DL equivalent. > > If both options are equally feasible, a plugin would be better, but if > it's easier to make i

Re: gucharmap branched for 2.22

Hi; Le mardi 08 janvier 2008 à 19:41 +0100, Claude Paroz a écrit : > Le mardi 08 janvier 2008 à 13:06 +0100, Christian Persch a écrit : > > Hi; > > > > Le mardi 08 janvier 2008 à 12:35 +0100, Gil Forcada a écrit : > > > seems gucharmap wasn't branched for 2.18 but in 2.20 instead, so which > > >

Re: gucharmap branched for 2.22

Le mardi 08 janvier 2008 à 13:06 +0100, Christian Persch a écrit : > Hi; > > Le mardi 08 janvier 2008 à 12:35 +0100, Gil Forcada a écrit : > > seems gucharmap wasn't branched for 2.18 but in 2.20 instead, so which > > branch applies to 2.18? > > I think the gnome-2-16 branch should be listed for

Re: Incorrect linefeeds (ie. Windows) in ChangeLogs

2008-01-02 klockan 19:10 skrev Yannig MARCHEGAY: > 2008/1/2, Daniel Nylander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Please don't use Windows when editing ChangeLog files. > This one is from file-roller but I've seen this on many files. > > 2007-12-31 Yannig Marchegay <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >^M > ^M >

Re: Friulian Translation:Super Help!

2007-12-22 klockan 14:47 skrev F Wolff: > Op Saterdag 2007-12-22 skryf Claude Paroz: > > Maybe the question was related to glibc? Is there any requirement to be > > able to use an entirely new language on Linux? > > On my system I can install a package called 'locales-fur' which will > enable the

Re: gconf branched

thanks, DL updated El dt 08 de 01 del 2008 a les 15:17 +0100, en/na Kjartan Maraas va escriure: > Hi. > > I just created a gnome-2-20 gconf branch so that I could fix some > strings on trunk. > > Cheers > Kjartan > > > ___ > gnome-i18n mailing list

String additions to 'gconf.HEAD'

This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org/. There have been following string additions to module 'gconf.HEAD': + "'\\%o' is not an ASCII character and thus isn't allowed in key names" + "Can't have a period '.' right after a slash '/'"

String additions to 'gconf.HEAD'

This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org/. There have been following string additions to module 'gconf.HEAD': + "Bypass server, and access the configuration database directly. Requires that gconfd is not running." + "Error loading som

gconf branched

Hi. I just created a gnome-2-20 gconf branch so that I could fix some strings on trunk. Cheers Kjartan ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

String additions to 'gconf.HEAD'

This is an automatic notification from status generation scripts on: http://l10n.gnome.org/. There have been following string additions to module 'gconf.HEAD': + "Backend `%s' failed to return a vtable\n" + "Failed to log addition of listener %s (%s); will not be able to restore this

Re: gucharmap branched for 2.22

thanks, already fixed in DL El dt 08 de 01 del 2008 a les 13:06 +0100, en/na Christian Persch va escriure: > Hi; > > Le mardi 08 janvier 2008 à 12:35 +0100, Gil Forcada a écrit : > > seems gucharmap wasn't branched for 2.18 but in 2.20 instead, so which > > branch applies to 2.18? > > I think t

Re: gucharmap branched for 2.22

Hi; Le mardi 08 janvier 2008 à 12:35 +0100, Gil Forcada a écrit : > seems gucharmap wasn't branched for 2.18 but in 2.20 instead, so which > branch applies to 2.18? I think the gnome-2-16 branch should be listed for 2.18 too. I've fixed the jhbuild modulset accordingly. Regards, Christia

Re: gucharmap branched for 2.22

hi! seems gucharmap wasn't branched for 2.18 but in 2.20 instead, so which branch applies to 2.18? already added the gnome-2-22 branch and set it to 2.22 release set cheers, El dt 08 de 01 del 2008 a les 09:27 +0100, en/na Christian Persch va escriure: > Hi; > > gucharmap has been retroactive

gucharmap branched for 2.22

Hi; gucharmap has been retroactively branched for GNOME 2.22; the branch name is "gnome-2-22". New development has already taken place on trunk. Regards, Christian ___ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/l